English

العربية

Filipino

Français

हिन्दी

Indonesia

বাংলা

اردو

中文

123movies search icon

muted

Antisocial

4.5

/10

3761 人评分

2014•1 h 30 m•Canada

Five university friends gather at a house party to ring in the New Year. Unbeknownst to them, an epidemic has erupted outside, causing outbreaks around the world.

Horror

Sci-Fi

Thriller

演员 (18)

Michelle Mylett

Cody Ray Thompson

Charlie Hamilton

Kirill Belousov

Kelly Michael Stewart

TV Reporter - desk

推荐

评论

lekshmipalottu

22/11/2022 12:58

I watch a lot of Sci-fi movies and the harsh reviews for this movie surprise me. Sure, it's kinda low budget and totally derivative but it deserves better than a 2 or 3!

mahdymasrity

22/11/2022 12:58

can anything be worse, bad acting, directing and for sure the casting is horrible, and why the are wearing gloves and then with them still on the touch their faces and hair!!!! the story plot is not right... try to avoid losing 2 hours of your life by watching this thing.. the ending is really Epic...

kumba willan

22/11/2022 12:58

OK, so this is one of those films you come across & think, 'I'll give it a go', and we're glad we did. Yes, the acting could be slightly better and yes, we could do with something to make us like the characters a little more. BUT, if you enjoy your zombie movies and you like to see a movie taking it beyond your basic shamblers/runners etc. then this does give you that. **Spoiler warning ahead** One of the things we love about watching zombie films is seeing if the makers can come up with 'inventive' kills. This movie has a few... We have 'Death by shoe' great. 'Death by laptop' brilliant. But, our favourite by far, (drum roll please) was 'Death by fairy-lights'. I think part of the enjoyment of this movie is the way they have fully taken in the whole evolution of zombies, which we've all probably seen the 'updated' evolution charts showing the original 'Night of the Living Dead' shamblers, to the 'Walking Dead' and '28 days Later' runners/infected right through to teenagers shambling along with their phones etc. in their hands, (of which we have two!) This movie has captured the sense of living through social media and run with it and, more to the point, done it quite well. And when you find yourself saying 'That type of mass brainwashing could actually happen' (minus the worm-like creatures) then you know it's been done well. So yes, definitely worth a watch. And we are now looking for more 'Red Room Production' and 'Black Fawn Films' movies. Oh, and by the way, this is the first ever movie review I've done and it's been done purely because we think this movie's definitely better than some of the reviews and star ratings would have you believe. Enjoy!

COPTER PANUWAT

22/11/2022 12:58

By half an hour in, I was wondering who possibly could watch this movie and not want to throw something at the screen. I read about the movie and it said a bunch of college students are holed up in their house while crazy events happen around them. That's not what happens, really, it's just a bunch of students holed up in a house while a virus spreads making everyone act like zombies. I didn't realize it was an almost zombie movie, and I'm pretty tired of zombies, I don't find them scary and I think they're played out. But every once in a while I'll see a zombie movie I like, so I stuck it out. They're not actually zombies though, they're not dead, they're just sick, and violent. For some reason the news in the movie says it's a biological terror attack, but in reality it's a virus spread by social media. Seriously. It comes through the cell phones of people messing around on "the social redroom" (facebook.) So there's that. Forget that it's literally impossible to spread a virus (a biological one) through a computer or a cell phone. It's like a computer virus that spreads to people if they spend too much time on social networking sites. This is explained at the end of the movie, which helps a little, but not really. The people in the movie don't realize how it spreads yet. They're all at a new year's party and a few of them spend most of the time with their friends on their phones or laptop. A bit of the movie we watch takes place on a screen on the screen. Then there's one guy who keeps saying "we don't know if he's infected" about 1) a friend of theirs who shows up at their door demanding to be let in with his nose and ears bleeding (the signs everyone says to watch for). He still wants to let him in, because "we don't know if that's what he has." Really? Then his friend who is in the house tells him he's sick, and says he has the symptoms, and he says it again. "We don't know if that's what you have." But then, when the girl in the house pukes, he thinks she has it. The one person with symptoms that don't fit the virus is the one person he assumes has it. This guy, by the way, is a medical undergrad student. There are some kind of interesting ideas, like when the dead die they basically become like computers themselves, or phones. I just can't get past the idea that if you look at a screen too much you will get a biological virus, because..no. The explanation is (SPOILER) that the site, and the infected, make your brain grow too big for your head. Even with that though, I probably would have enjoyed it more if the actors didn't act like such morons. They do in a lot of horror movies, but these guys are too dumb. And the ending doesn't really make sense, though I kind of liked it.

Elsa Eyang

22/11/2022 12:58

I love movies in which the characters are locked up with each other in a small place. If it is a horror it's another positive point. This movie has both advantages, and even its basic idea is great: people go crazy from social media exposure. Yet the filmmakers managed to create a bad trash horror from it. In my opinion the first two thirds of the movie are great. In the beginning we see how friends have a party, but then strange things happen in the outside world. We can observe it like they do: trough the TV and the internet. The actors are not good but they deliver their play adequate. The characters reactions to the events are fairly logical and understandable, but they can be a little annoying. This part of the movie is so far so good. Avarege horror performance with a few interesting tweaks. But then the movie begins to turn into the terrible horror cliché trash I mentioned before. In the beginning I thought: Hm that's interesting. People are mentally 'infected' from a social media website bug and are going crazy. This is a good idea! Then the filmmakers decided to reveal the stupidest plot twist I have seen in my life: from the website a worm or nerve or I don't even know what kind of tumor started to grow in the people and this thing makes them a kind of zombie for a time and then they die. Then to further push the movie into a deep casm of stupidness the main character drills a hole in her own head to remove it, and of course survives. Here I think I have seen everything bad this movie could deliver, but no no no.. Our hero leaves the apartment and we see all the people died from the tumor lying in the streets. Then just before the movie ends every dead person stands up because they became undead. I don't advise you to watch this movie. Only if you want to have a tumor developed in your brain like the people in this bad trash movie.

kholu

22/11/2022 12:58

Any surgeons out there? You guys and girls will especially "enjoy" this nonsense. You will be like Mike and the robots from MST3K doing a running commentary, and that goes for the grand finale in which the main characters attempt to engage in DYI cranial surgery. Without anesthesia. Without sterilized instruments. This absurd premise is pushed so far that the main female protagonist (who is amazingly stupid) drills a hole into her own head, while standing, and without any pain-killers. She then places a handkerchief over the wound (kinda like bringing a hammer and nail into the orbit to fix a NASA shuttle) and then goes into fight mode vs the zombies. A scene so dumb I could swear Stephen King had written it and Argento directed it. With De Palma acting as adviser. The characters do everything to make their own extermination as easy as possible. There is certain logic in panic-stricken people making wrong decisions, but these five just do and say way too many dumb things. For example, the curly hair guy keeps touching everybody despite being told that a major infection has taken over. That main female character comes off as a moron who just sits there and stares at walls, pondering what to do after the realization that she's pregnant. As if the viewers give a hoot about her pregnancy. Apocalypse or pregnancy? Yes, I'd say the former wins. What gets the movie some points is the somewhat original premise of a Facebook-like evil conglomerate causing the zombie plague by lobotomizing their viewers to use the site more. That explains why the symptoms are nearly exactly the same from person to person. Sure, it's a bit reminiscent of "Pulse" or "Pontypool" and a few other films but it's not reminiscent of 1000 movies - at least as far as the explanation is concerned. As for the zombies, they're stereotypical fare mostly. Michelle Mylett, the one who drills a hole into her own head, is unfortunately a symptom of our dumb, twisted age: an anorexic actress whose arms are as thin as my fingers. How the hell does a mentally-ill approach to diet become the social norm - and a sexy look! Naturally, she's flat-chested as well, because there seems to be a conspiracy in American show-biz as of late that no chesty women are allowed into movies or TV. This is very obvious and blatant discrimination and I'm amazed that nobody seems to have picked up on it - especially large-breasted women who should feel annoyed and disrespected by it.

Sarah Elizabeth

22/11/2022 12:58

It is not awful. It is not quite full of anything. This is a nice experiment if nothing else. The main story is basically a complete mix of any viral outbreak film, and the Pulse movies. The ending is so Resident Evil, and everything in the middle is sort of Dawson's Creek- ish. There are some really neat new ideas mixed in with all of the same old, and the acting is (overall) very good, you might even be impressed with the complexity of the special effects, as they do a fair job with all of the different computer generated, and make-up effects. I Don't for two seconds buy that she can even lift that axe at the end though, there is just no way. The same one in the poster has been shrunk down to look more real. I guess in the end I Enjoyed this movie, and would recommend it to anyone who has already seen the Pulse movies, and would like to see a more contemporary take on that idea, or someone like myself who just needs to watch it all, otherwise I would say pass. If you only watch 30 movies a year, you don't have time for this one.

Giovanni Rey

22/11/2022 12:58

Whenever I see a horror movie on IMDb rated between 4.0 - 4.5 I can be sure it's going to be fairly decent budget at least, as even the best horror usually doesn't crack 7+. This isn't the most original story ever, but as far as "zombie" flick, you gotta give it some credit for not being the exact same as 99% of zombie films. The story itself is just okay, but enough to keep you watching. 6/10 The budget was solid. No iPhone 4s filming. 8/10 Acting...it was fine. 6/10 Overall it kept me entertained and if someone brought up the film, I'd remember it more fondly than negatively. Take that for what it's worth. Also, I think this was much better than the sequel.

Ouiam :)

22/11/2022 12:58

This movie is a blatant rider of the "Zombie Outbreak" bandwagon of the early 2010's. Like so many Zombie movies released during this period Antisocial lacks the substance and heart of those old B-grade flicks making it fell more like a money grab than anything. The premise regarding the cause of the infection (which is my personal favorite part of Zombie movies) is so nonsensical and unscientific that I just cant take this movie seriously.Not to say it didn't have its good parts, however these are few and far between. Any true lover of zombie movies will be truly disappointed. Seriously if you have the 90 mins it takes to watch this movie, you're better of attempting to perform backyard brain-surgery on yourself with a power-drill.

Fantastic

22/11/2022 12:58

This movie comes to me as the project of two rich young cinematography students that while sharing a beer come up with a script in like 15 minutes. Underdeveloped plot, underdeveloped characters, pointless dialogs and censored gore to save it for the ladies. Terrible, terrible movie. If you're studying cinematography you may want to see this movie to appreciate the technical aspects of filming (to some extent). If you're an actor, you may want to see this movie because if there is anything that saved this movie from being total garbage is the effort the actors put to keep up with the script and not falling flat to the floor while pulling their hairs off out of shame. Awful script. Decent direction. Decent acting.