Accueil
Films
Séries
Animés
À venir
Explorer
- Télécharger l'App
- Téléchargeur
Blogs

English

العربية

Filipino

Français

हिन्दी

Indonesia

বাংলা

اردو

中文

Télécharger slide

123movies search icon

muted

House of Seven Belles

4.4

/10

181 notes

1979•1 h 32 m•United States

The seven sisters of the outcast LeFleur family try to survive in a post-Civil War Deep South.

Drama

Horror

Acteurs (7)

Jonathan Harker

Recommandé

Avis

Miss Jey Arts

29/05/2023 07:19

source: House of Seven Belles

Iammohofficial

25/05/2023 11:34

Moviecut—House of Seven Belles

TextingStory

23/05/2023 03:13

Who paid for these films of his? That's what you should ask yourself. Milkin was a horrible filmmaker by any standards but is trucked out by a group that wants him to be a dieity. He sucks. This movie in particular is a head scratcher. Who would want to go to a movie theatre to see it? And who was dumb enough to pay for this garbage? And who is even dumber to rescue the print and try to market it? Milkin had no busines making movies. The movie is horrible. Poorly directed and written with acting that is middle school level. Plus the subject matter is not sellable. Why we should care that it was never finished is beyond me. We should wonder how it ever got made.

Rishi Cholera

23/05/2023 03:13

Andy Milligan's House of Seven Belles has some good qualities. It's shot on 35mm film, well lit, outstanding period costumes, good locations. What it lacks is a plot. It's a talky series of scenes, some good, some very slow. The lack of pacing could be attributed to it still being a rough cut, although compared to Milligan's earlier works, it ain't so rough. The problem with the film is marketing. What would Andy have done with it? It's not horrific enough to be a horror film. Barely anything happens in 92 minutes. There are a few gore effects, but not enough to sustain interest. It's hard to even picture it as the third feature on a triple bill at the drive-in.

Ada SALIOU

29/03/2023 16:04

Who paid for these films of his? That's what you should ask yourself. Milkin was a horrible filmmaker by any standards but is trucked out by a group that wants him to be a dieity. He sucks. This movie in particular is a head scratcher. Who would want to go to a movie theatre to see it? And who was dumb enough to pay for this garbage? And who is even dumber to rescue the print and try to market it? Milkin had no busines making movies. The movie is horrible. Poorly directed and written with acting that is middle school level. Plus the subject matter is not sellable. Why we should care that it was never finished is beyond me. We should wonder how it ever got made.

user9755029206812

23/03/2023 16:02

source: House of Seven Belles

Lolitaps Pianke

23/03/2023 16:02

Andy Milligan's House of Seven Belles has some good qualities. It's shot on 35mm film, well lit, outstanding period costumes, good locations. What it lacks is a plot. It's a talky series of scenes, some good, some very slow. The lack of pacing could be attributed to it still being a rough cut, although compared to Milligan's earlier works, it ain't so rough. The problem with the film is marketing. What would Andy have done with it? It's not horrific enough to be a horror film. Barely anything happens in 92 minutes. There are a few gore effects, but not enough to sustain interest. It's hard to even picture it as the third feature on a triple bill at the drive-in.