Watch Your Back

source: Watch Your Back

It's the same plot we have seen over and over. Woman being stalked by someone taking her photo, but this time there's a twist...but a bad twist. She's the villain. This ending revelation does not add up with the rest of the movie. Poorly executed. Everyone's acting is horrible, as with every post 2015 LMN Movie. Reel One Entertainment/Blue Sky Productions are an embarrassment to the film industry and are making a mockery out of LMN. The network has become a joke because of this production comany.

This movie put me through all of the emotions 😂 I was on the edge of my seat! Good plot twist! Very unexpected. I thought it was going to be like all of the other stalker movies. And the entire time I pointed a finger at all of the side characters, so the ending came as a big surprise. Im glad no one else got hurt in the end, especially the little girl or the dad. I hope he marries the assistant!

Very unrealistic situations. Characters doing all the wrong things like, (we have a stalker threatening us. Do we call the police? No, let's deal with it ourselves.) A plot that's honestly been played to death. You can guess the bad guy the first time they're introduced. Completely predictable with an ending twist that's almost hilarious because it was too obvious where it was headed. Actors that look like they're acting and can't feel the characters they're supposed to be playing. No surprises, just drama for dramas sake.

They really was not a review of the movie. The person who wrote this obviously is jealous or something of the actress. What you wrote was just playing cruel, not interesting, off topic And in my opinion a waste of time. I will watch the movie later myself and put in a review.

This was an entertaining watch about a women who starts receiving threatening photos from a stalker, who is it and what are their motivations ? There were some nice twists in the story and you are always trying to guess who the stalker could be, there is the odd red herring thown in to keep the audience on their toes, a worthwhile watch and above average made for tv movie

The plot twist at the end is not good. The acting and performance was very cold. Nothing is real. The story itself is weak.

"Watch Your Back" (a.k.a., "Killer Photo") is a crackling good yarn. A high-tech assassin is on the loose using sophisticated a photo surveillance operation to harass Sarah Goodall Miller, who has recently married an unemployed writer, Kurt Miller. The Millers seem like the perfect family with the chemistry between Sarah and Kurt and his adorable daughter Teri. But, appearances may be deceiving! The plot thickens when the Millers appear to be targeted for an assassination. Nearly all of the characters are suspicious in some way, including Sarah's obnoxious, flirty co-worker Jackson, her overly officious assistant Julie, and the neighbor Louise, who is infatuated with Kurt. Behind the scenes, the mastermind of the assassinations is killed in a police shootout, leaving Sarah on her own to set things right. There is excellent suspense built, and the filmmakers keep the audience guessing as to who is the villain of the piece. The final ten minutes offer the granddaddy of all plot twists, as the rug is pulled out from under the audience. The actress playing Sarah was terrific and very credible with the delicate character transformation she had to achieve at the end. The surprises come in a fast and furious manner in the thrilling ending! The best advice possible for film viewers is to watch your back!

This is one of the better LMN movies, because it has a decent story line with a nice plot twist in it. McCord plays a good part as a supposed stalking victim in a usual standard LMN movie. Where it loses me is the husband character, who's daughter is being threatened but he couldn't sufficiently protect her. It followed the LMN theme of, "It takes a woman".

It starts out misleadingly well and offers a few nail biting moments. But the surprise ending is really no surprise at all, just the product of some no talent writer with a creative deficit. It also is a totally absurd and blatantly dishonest ending. It would be so nice if the hacks who grind out these Canadian crappers, probably Y&R rejects, had some original ideas. This is just a slight twist on a standard plot that has been used endless times. And of course it is another of these outrageous "made in Canada but set in the US" films, subsidized by the Canadian taxpayer. I believe it was shot in Vancouver. (IMDB does not list the shooting location) Again Vancouver is a surrogate for Seattle. Our movie policy may make work for a lot of second-rate Canadian actors, techhies and such.(The good ones have gone to Hollywood.) But how can they possibly take pride in being part of the "Canadian" film industry when the industry itself has no pride in Canada