Warnings

Moviecut—Warnings

This movie had a good concept. It was a tried-and-true concept, but reliable. That being said, there were two major issues w/ the movie. Th first was the poor pacing. Everything was very boring for the first 3/4ths of the movie. The final quarter of the movie felt rushed to me. Its comparable to fire work shows that slowly lets off a few non-remarkable fireworks and then hurriedly light them all off at the very end. The second issue is the godawful acting. To be fair, the script didn't give the actors & actresses much to work with, but they need to go back to acting class. The cast also didnt appear to have chemistry amongst one another or something, so the final product looked just that much more forced. There are many good movies out there to watch or re-watch. I would skip this one.

I went into this movie wondering why it had 3.3 stars when the preiview looked so good, so I might have been paying a bit to much attention to detail in the beginning. But it seemed like this movie got a great location; the house has some amazing details THAT WE ALMOST NEVER GET TO SEE because the camera tends to stick to the same angles or focuses on the actors. Honestly, most of the movie takes place in the kitchen from two camera angles. As for the script, it seemed like the writer was trying to hard to be casual? The actors were certainly giving it their all, but it was rather awkward at times. That all being said, I forgot about all those things around the halfway point and was invested. I stuck around for the end. All in all, I didn't hate it. Can't say I recommend it, but I wouldn't be put out to watch it again. The scares, once they really got going, were pretty good, though I personally hate gore and this could have done without. EDIT: It occurs to me now that I assumed some things at the end of the movie that were never actually said. So I suppose the movie doesn't really explain much itself.

My husband enjoyed looking at the house and seeing it's potential, but it stopped there. It was definitely in a California wildfire zone. But, the plot... A man and his girlfriend buy the property to start a weed farm. Yet, oddly, they don't have a single firearm of any kind. They're out in the middle of nowhere. May I suggest a shotgun? If they'd had anyway to defend themselves, this movie would have been four minutes long. Also, the bad guys looked like their makeup was done with a grocery store Halloween kit. It's a pass...

This movie isn't bad as some reviews say it is. I definitely enjoyed it and thought it was well done. The acting and plot is well done and it does exactly as it's intended to do: bring suspense slowly until you finally understand more and more about what's really going on in the area they went to. Give it a watch for sure!

Director did spend all of the time on Political Correctness and forgot his job.

I came in not expecting much of this film, but to my surprise the movie was actually really good for a low budget horror film. I still don't know how they were able to pull it off because when you look at it in terms of quality, the production was top notch. The cast was consistent and very believable with great chemistry between the actors that made it very enjoyable to watch.

There are definitely some minor flaws with this film, but when you look at the $250k budget it far exceeds other film with million dollar budgets. It is fast paced, and beautifully shot.

Started off slow but the acting wasn't too horrible so I hung in there. Definitely develops its pace and actually turned into a nice little horror movie. So I would suggest being patient and you won't be too disappointed.

The worst acting i have ever witnessed in my life. These people need to give up and stop this immediately.