Warlock: The End of Innocence

source: Warlock: The End of Innocence

Trailer—Warlock III: The End of Innocence

Warlock III: The End of Innocence

...As long as I could see her and admire her, I wouldn't mind spending the whole day watching a commercial or infomercial where she appeared.

the third part of the series is simply blasphemic. Trying to make a 90s teenieshlasher version out of the great warlock sujet. Where Part 1 & 2 had atmosphere, fun and style (no big surprise looking, who directed them) Part 3 is only boring,plotless and stupid. Not to forget acted real badly. Only Payne as Warlock is acceptable.

This was better than Warlock #2: The Armageddon and is equivalent to Warlock #1. This one featured average horror movie characters, except The Warlock, played by Bruce Payne better than anybody else played him. It involves a couple of kids (teens) who go to a house that belonged to a maniac. It turnes of that the maniac was a Warlock and now he's after them. Some good special effects. Rated R for some extreme horror gore, violence, brief nudiy and some brief, but strong profanity, as well as some adult situations.

This movie is pretty damn good. Way better than #2, and just a nose away from the first. This film focuses around the miller house and goes back to reveal a bit more about the Warlock and his presence in colonial times. It is really quite well done and the acting put forth by Bruce Payne supersedes Julian Sands'. It is also quite creatively done, especially what the Warlock does. Excellent, probably the best in the series.

This dreadful third installment is more like the TV series Friends than the previous entries and has replaced the wonderful Julian Sands with a horribly miscast Bruce Payne in this pointless bore. A group of 30-year-old actors posing as college kids stay at a mansion once owned by the evil warlock. OOOOHHHH I'm so scared already. This direct-to-video joke has very few moments that we'll enjoy and 99 percents just stinks. Ditch this clunker and re-watch the first two (preferably #1) or wait till they get it right next time.

I just saw this on tv so don't know how it was promoted when it first came out. Was it advertized on daytime soap operas? It looks like a "horror" movie for people who don't like horror movies. And it's made in the popular style of movies churned out by directors who don't know how to make movies but wish to put across the impression to children that they DO know all the "tricks" of making dramatic flicks. As others here have said, there are lots of tv shows a lot scarier than this mediocre slop.

Not as good as the first two episodes, but it is still an interesting low budget movie. 5.5/10