The White Tiger

The White Tiger_720p(480P)

source: The White Tiger

What's good 1. The story is good. It shows the dark reality of the society. 2. The screenplay is also good. There are many scenes that show the biases of people. 3. The performances are good. Adarsh gourav shines in the lead role of Balram. Rajkumar Rao didn't shine because his role wasn't that great and Priyanka Chopra couldn't shine as her role was too small. They need to be appreciated for taking supporting roles in spite of being big stars. Due to them, this film will reach lots of people who wouldn't have watched this film otherwise. Vijay Maurya made me hate him through his great acting although his role was small. Mahesh Manjrekar was wasted. What's bad: 1. The film is talking about religion, caste, class and gender discrimination. It might offend some people. 2. It isn't a family film.

In the end it look like a Sawdhan india special episode.

Total waste of time. Poor ending. Expected more from the movie, having a awesome cast in the movie. 2 hour wasted 😕😕😕

Don't waste your time in watching a movie that justifies a crime.. and mocks religion they don't understand? What a fake climax it has. And yes it was boring like a documentary. I am a great fan of RK Rao and watched only because of him. I am not sure why RK would sign such a movie. I feel he needs to be careful otherwise his fans will be disappointed.

A cross between 'Slumdog Millionaire' (Danny Boyle, 2007) and 'Parasite' (Bong Joon-ho, 2019), Ramin Bahrani's 'The White Tiger' roars as it expertly integrates an engrossing socio-political commentary about the rich poor divide in India with a thrilling, bitingly cynical narrative. Bahrani's direction is clear and controlled but, unfortunately, unable to develop the screenplay to the point required for success. The cast breathes some decent life into the material at times with Adarsh Gourav leads with a highly entertaining performance.

Good movie it's deserves more attention.priyanka did an excellent job

Poor treatment of servants by masters is something from the dead past, like sati, untouchability, etc. In today's India even the poorest of the poor have cellphones have enough self-awareness about their rights as a Human being. Leaving that aside and coming to the main topic of the movie - Even if the driver was forced to sign a false confession and you feel sad for his plight, it does not justify the character to promote evil values like lying, stealing from his employer and ultimately murdering him. Now this employer 'Ashok' was actually the good character unlike evil characters like his brother or father. Showing that the protagonist becoming a successful businessman by committing murder, giving large sums of bribe to the police and callously ignoring the fact that his family of 17 got murdered by evil characters as revenge for his actions is simply promoting wrong values. Your emotions and sad past cannot be used as an excuse for you to commit murder and steal and these values should not be promoted among people by such movies. Do the movie makers actually want an India with such people? The story is flawed and I wouldn't recommend the movie.

The plot summary of the movie says, 'The epic journey of a poor Indian driver who must use his wit and cunning to break free from servitude to his rich masters and rise to the top of the heap.'. Seriously, killing his employer and taking his name does not make him smart or cunning, throughout the movie all he's doing is slaving, and is a victim until the moment where he kills his employer, that too happens at the very end of the movie. And they want us to believe he gets away just by bribing a police officer at a station, as if there's nobody else in the police force who might be looking for a suspect who has committed murder, especially of someone who has political connections. I cant believe how can this be an epic journey. I have not read the book so cant comment on the original story, but if its the same story then the plot summary of the movie is incorrect. The story is the story of many Indians who come from rural India and are part of the feudal system that exists there. But it is by no means story of someone with wit or cunning and is not a foolproof way to get rich. Also scenes where he writes to and then meets the Chinese premier was a bit unrealistic. Not sure if he actually email him the whole story or he was just recollecting it while writing the email. Pros: Acting Productions values Cons: Everything else :) Its a one time watch, but don't expect too much.