The Thin Red Line
United States
209582 people rated Adaptation of James Jones' autobiographical 1962 novel, focusing on the conflict at Guadalcanal during the second World War.
Drama
History
War
Cast (18)
You May Also Like
User Reviews
Julie Bamba
29/05/2023 19:01
source: The Thin Red Line
Rishi Cholera
12/09/2022 05:29
The single worst movie I have EVER seen. I can NOT tell you what this movie is about because it has no story, no plot. It came out right after Saving Private Ryan, which didn't help it, since SPR ruined all war movies to come after it (or so I thought, after seeing this.. Later Black Hawk Down, We Were Soldiers, and others have proved that theory wrong-THANKFULLY!) Anyways, there was one scene in which the platoon or whatever was trying to take this hill. They took it, and then the movie went on.. For no apparent reason whatsoever. I wish someone would tell me what I'm missing in this movie. Poetry it may be, but it is not my cup of tea. Saw it in the theaters, my wife walked out after two hours. It is just very boring. Even Windtalkers, as bad as it was, had a plot. This has none. And if all it is is showing different people involved in war, with no link between them and no actual story, well then, I'd rather watch a documentary about it. Review written 3-3-05. Walt D in LV
Habtamu Asmare
12/09/2022 05:29
The overly philosophical chatter and the slowness of the film have lost me. Not that I don't like slow action and can take the voice off, but the conversation of God, Nature and the like I didn't have a lot of patience for them. Most of the time it started to wander. The combat scenes are good, and the rawness of death and madness show well.
Sommité Røyal
12/09/2022 05:29
It's hard to believe this rubbish was nominated for Best Film alongside "Saving Private Ryan". It must have been good politicking because there is nothing to this film. Maybe the book was good, but I won't read it because the film was so disappointing. For a 3-hour war film, there certainly was not any battle scenes that typically make up successful war flicks. There was just artsy-fartsy dream sequences that go on and on and bore you to tears. Nick Nolte stands out however, so see it if you like him. All the other Hollywood names add nothing, and the main character is so bland I didn't care a whit about him. Check out the classic War films such as: "Cromwell", "Zulu", "Waterloo", "Braveheart", "Tora Tora Tora", "Charge of the Light Brigade", etc...
Bin2sweet
12/09/2022 05:29
Theres been bad movies made in the past but nothing comes close to this trash. I'm still numb. What in the hell WAS that? No plot. No characters to care about. Disconnected, disjointed, boring, pointless, stunningly awful. Who is this Terrance Maklic and how do I get him to give me 2 hours of my life back? All those guns and nobody thought to shoot this maniac before he finished this tripe. How could ANYONE in thier right mind like this crap? I've read some of the other reviews and all I can say is they must be on some pretty good drugs to see any redeeming value to this waste of film.
moonit
12/09/2022 05:29
"I like you captain, and I'd just want you to know that, we're in this thing together" growls Lt. Col. Gordon Tall early in what has to be one of the most innovative war films ever made, and that is truly how the audience feels, as if they are it with the characters. The perfect cinematography and directing create such immersion, that we really feel as though we are one of Charlie company, fighting alongside them. This practically first person view contributes to this being possibly the most visually stimulating war film ever made, and this allows the audience to really picture the horror of combat. When combined with fantastic performances from the likes of Nick Nolte, whose deranged persistence is a highlight of his career, the film is as thought provoking as the best of all war films, Apocalypse Now, and a comparison to that shows how brilliant a film Terrence Malick has created.
Rø Ýâ Ltÿ
09/09/2022 01:38
Despite an all-star cast and critical acclaim, I found this movie to be a big yawn. Two hours of close-ups of soldier's faces surrounded by nothing but tall grass and another hour of close-ups of soldiers' faces with a stream or other landscape as a backdrop. I know this isn't an action film but I found it difficult to invest myself it in when I couldn't even tell if they were advancing or retreating, were near the enemy, or anything else. If the cast hadn't been full of familiar faces, I would've been totally lost because they all look the so similar with helmets and dirty faces. This movie was a huge disappointment.
@amiiiiiiiiii💋
09/09/2022 01:38
The title I gave this review pretty much sums-up this criminal waste of time. What more need be said about it? I wish I could sue the filmmakers for not only wasting my time but for causing me great irritation.
Judging by the first ten minutes alone, the filmmakers clearly believed they are documentarians. They are not. They are talentless garbage-movie-makers. This movie could have been one tenth its length, and it would still have been slow, pointless, and extremely boring - to a mind-numbing degree.
It's movies like this that really encourage me to just stop watching movies altogether. In fact, I think I'm very close to that point. This movie is yet another false promise made by pretentious narcissists with their heads utterly stuck up their rear ends.
shazia
09/09/2022 01:38
This is one of those movies where while watching it, I have to wonder if there's something I just don't get. To me this movie was long winded and boring. There were interesting observations to be made about men's behaviour in war for sure, but certainly there are better ways to show that than this movie.
Also this movie makes a big mistake that has been made before. Casting big named actors in small roles. To me that's just stupid. It brings more attention than is due to a small part. They didn't just commit that mistake once either, this movie is full of them! Clooney of course being the worst. What did he have two sentences?
Overall, this almost three hour movie was painful to watch, it just couldn't keep me interested.
Officer Woos
09/09/2022 01:38
I was very disappointed in this movie. I wasn't expecting "Saving Private Ryan" or any other war film but what I was expecting, was a movie. War may be tedious, but a movie shouldn't be. Not long into the movie, the gratuitous nature shots got old real quickly (thus my comparison to National Geo). So little time was spent on any one character that there was no one that you felt interested in. The opening (I don't call him main) character spent most of the movie looking like a wet-eyed seal with this somber expression on his face - I almost thought he was a mute. The movie which may have tried to be either uplifting or spiritual was neither. I have to admit, I've only walked out of 1 movie before (Prospero's Books) and I was more than tempted to walk out on this one. Disappointing effort by what should have been an ensemble cast.