The Revelation of the Pyramids

The mere fact that a film made with very scientific pretensions is being removed from everywhere and stigmatised everywhere shows what a real challenge it is to mainstream archaeology juggling with ridiculous 'evidence'. The funny thing is, there are no alien beings in it. The cleverly crafted film simply points out the contradictions that surround the construction of the pyramid, for which the mainstream lunatics cannot offer a rational explanation. Instead, they stick to completely obvious nonsense that you don't even need to be an expert to spot. And then, of course, comes the part where they start to excoriate and label as pseudo-scientific those who have put many years of real research into the film. Guys, try building a pyramid with Bronze Age tools and see how far you get. Good luck! You will need it.

Trailer—The Revelation of the Pyramids

The Revelation of the Pyramids_720p(480P)

source: The Revelation of the Pyramids

Science is hard. You have to read a lot of stuff and you also have to use your brain to understand it. This pseudocumentary is one of the most prominent examples how mental laziness combined with the devastating impact of (a)social media can turn historical science into conspiracy banter. The Ph. D. holders in this world stand little chance to weather an avalanche of BS, but the willingness of so many people to subscribe to outlandish theories forces as many clarifications as patience can muster. The film's premise is that the tools of 4500 years ago would not have allowed Ancient Egyptians to build on such a magnificent scale, and that the pyramids - and other major ancient constructions - serve an astronomical rather than a religious or funerary purpose. The jumpy conclusion is that they must be remnants of a civilization that came before us, and that they intend us to warn about the consequences of climate change. To make that last point, artifacts from a time span of over 4000 years are haphazardly combined, from the pyramids to the Moai on Rapa Nui. All of this can be easily debunked. The Ancient Egyptians developed an understanding of Geometry early on because the tide of the Nile was paramount for harvesting and taxation. Architects such as the first Pharaoh's chancellor Imhotep were revered (in his case deified), and construction was viewed as supreme art. Astronomy was one of the earliest scientific endeavors because the stars were the only source of light apart from the sun, which was identified as the source of vegetation and therefore life early on. The combination of ritualistic and scientific purposes makes complete sense in such an environment. Ancient Egypt was a totalitarian monarchy, so the entire population could be obliged - perhaps even willingly so - to participate in the construction of a monument to not just their ruler, but their society as a whole, which would explain their relatively short construction period. Why then do so many people believe that this is just not possible? The most likely response would be racism. Mathematics and Geometry are commonly ascribed to Caucasian Greeks of the 6th/5th century BC, although it's obvious that they learned it from Egyptians during the Minoan Age. There's just no solid proof for this because of thousands of years of warfare. Especially Frenchmen like the "informer" of this film Jacques Grimault (who is involved in lots of litigation by the way) have come up with intellectual constructs to declare non-Caucasian civilizations incapable of scientific achievement. The inventor of race theory, Arthur de Gobineau, was French after all. That doesn't mean the Ancient Egyptians were black, they were bronze-colored, but African nevertheless - and so are their achievements. While I am generally not in favor of critical race theory (complex problems are not solved with general theories), this film is actually a fairly good example why it's necessary. The real mystery is not how the pyramids were built, but why so many people regard our civilization as the pinnacle of human existence.

Most of the history we are fed is presented by so called experts who usually just spew unrealistic theories as facts. When information is presented that contradicts or fails to follow their (stories) it's labeled as misinformation and attacked by hired drones in an attempt to discredit the work because it creates doubt on the pre-packaged misinformation that we're all expected to blindly follow because self proclaimed (experts) demand it. Watch this documentary with an open mind and come to your own conclusions on what you believe may be true. If our so called historical (experts) were really experts then they would have it all figured out with proof, but in reality they either have no clue, or they are intentionally misleading us away from the truth to protect ancient hidden secrets for their benefit.

The previous review proves the case - before any comment on the film's merits and claiming that he doesn't go in for conspiracy theories, the reviewer immediately labels the subject an 'amateur topic', and brings up the red herring of 'conspiracy' by invoking it as possibly the work of Scientology, and reveals the ad hominem attack that is so commonly relied upon when other more solid refutations simply don't exist. When he does get around to addressing the case laid out by the filmmaker, all he can say is to admit that 'based on their 'argumentation line' and "what they want you to think', that it makes sense to him. Duh. Forget about 'what they want you to think', and simply be open to the math and the realities of what stands right before us that we still can't somehow explain. The film is well done all around. The narrative voice and translations are handled well, and the numerous layers of math, geometry, physics and astronomy - and the implications of all of these 'coincidences' is compelling.

This peice of documentary singlehandly changed how I look at ancient civilizations now. Its shocking how the mainstream media is trying to falsify this by associating it with Alien theories and what not, Its actually based on facts and facts alone. The conclusion at the end is really eye opener.

Contains spoiler(s). There seems to be 2 English versions of this documentary - with the male one being the most widely available? The woman narration has been pointed out as being the more authentic - but I haven't done a close analysis to see why is this one better? I can imagine that they don't differ widely in the general presentation given - to bring to light what measurements are contained within the Great Pyramid, and how important the Sphinx is, tied to the Great Pyramid. This is a must view documentary for anyone intrigued by the Great Pyramid and wish to know more about it. It is of course the most baffling monument from antiquity - though it's high precision can be linked to others - of the same exactness and age? What can be confirmed - is that diorite stone pounders and copper chisels were not used to carve, shape and assemble precision fitting stones together - without mortar - then, how did they do it? This documentary does not provide answers as to how did they do it? Except to say that current explanations given by egyptologists are thoroughly inadequate. Hopefully this and other such documentaries will encourage further research into this puzzles - which need adequate explanation - which should help fill in the missing gap of human history that we know so little about. That mankind is of the order of millions of years old, but we can only go back to around 12,000 or less years of human history - that the further back we go - the less we know ... It is better to disregard the Bible and of Christianity, etc - they are of no help to clear up our missing history. In that all cultures and their histories are as important as any other to help fill in the gaps - and to not rely upon one source/explanation alone - to tell the whole story. The Bible and Christianity are so overrated - and I personally think they are wildly inaccurate and unreliable for any information - the same for all religious sources - that you cannot rely on them alone to give you clear facts or information. But I don't disregard them completely - as they have their own story to tell one day - when the truth about religions be told - one day - perhaps?

I will give an account of what fascinated me the most ( w.r.t Giza) after watching and researching this documentary. Golden Ratio: The surface area of above four surfaces totaled divided by area of base gives golden ratio. If we consider mid distance of one of the four sides from the centre length to be one the height gives square root of golden ratio and the hypotenuse golden ratio itself. The triangle that gives us this numbers measures angles as 38-90-52 degrees. pi: If we consider height of pyramid as radius and use '2 x radius x pi' we get perimeter of the base. Thus (perimeter / 2r) gives us pi. speed of light: The coordinate of location give numerical value of speed of light. Also if diagonal of square formed by base is considered diameter to bigger circle and the length cutting midpoints of sides is considered diameter to small circle. Circumference of bigger circle formed subtracted by circumference of smaller circle gives 'numerical value' of speed of light. Feel free to google it yourselves. The structures portrayed in documentary and their locations (with respect to each other) are fascinating. Final Verdict: If you have asked me a few years ago about the construction of such structure's, I would have said it to be that by Aliens or living beings from not of this time. Today however I feel it could have been built by the humans then as it contains math that can be seen in nature as well.