muted

The Number 23

Rating6.4 /10
20071 h 38 m
United States
219503 people rated

Walter Sparrow becomes obsessed with a novel that he believes was written about him, as more and more similarities between himself and his literary alter ego seem to arise.

Crime
Mystery
Thriller

User Reviews

Hegue-Zelle Tsimis

21/03/2025 05:27
The Number 23-1080P

👑 ملكة التيك توك 👑

21/03/2025 05:27
The Number 23-720P

amjad kalyar

21/03/2025 05:27
The Number 23-480P

Nadia Jaftha

21/03/2025 05:27
The Number 23-1080P

❤❤

21/03/2025 05:27
The Number 23-720P

kyliesloo

21/03/2025 05:27
The Number 23-480P

Jam Imperio

11/05/2024 16:00
The Number 23 begins beautifully. The acting is excellent, the situation compelling, the cinematography gorgeous. But none of this saves the film from outstaying its welcome. There is an exact minute the movie becomes nothing more than excruciatingly dense exposition, like watching a lecture on film, and I am tempted to bring a stopwatch into it to discover if that minute relates in any way to the number 23, so that I can rest assured it was a self-conscious joke. I wish I could say it ran only 23 minutes longer than it should have, but I have a sneaking suspicion it ran on more like forty. The Number 23 suffers from a lot of good ideas that never exactly come together, and a mystery with a reveal so obtuse and verbose you flash back to Fred, Daphne, and Velma and lament fondly that they got it over with so, so much quicker.

Siwat Chotchaicharin

11/05/2024 06:40
Hrmm... where to start. Matthew Libatuque is about as good of a cinematographer as there is working, and for the visually inclined out there, this one is a feast. Jim Carrey.... hrmm... Jim Carrey. I like it when comic actors play dark, as long as it's done well. He does this one well, but he's still the wrong actor for the role. There's a difference between being dark and playing dark, and unfortunately, he was just playing. This one was SCREAMING for Colin Farrell, but instead we get Jim Carrey proving that he really can act. But as for the movie, I can simply say it's a mixed bag, and the fault there goes to Joel Schumacher. He gets credit for being a mainstream director who likes the dark material, but once again (*ahem* 8mm) he either doesn't understand the material, or isn't willing to stick up for it's integrity in the face of his big studio bosses. Either way, David Fincher could have done wonders with this, or Christopher Nolan, or any of the other directors who have a talent with solid, dark material. The ending is the ultimate fault of the movie. Obviously, some suspension of disbelief is required for something like this, but the ending so strains credulity that it ruins some otherwise noteworthy work in the rest of the film. There are so many excellent directions this could have gone, but Schumacher opted for clever, and that relegates this one to little more than a renter.

nadasabri

11/05/2024 06:39
"Fate" leads Walter Sparrow to come in possession of a mysterious novel that has eerie similarities and connections to his life, all based around the number 23. As the story unfolds in real life and fiction, Sparrow must figure out his connection to the book and how the story will eventually end. The Number 23 offers an intriguing premise that is undone by a weak execution. The film just failed on many different levels which is pretty disappointing because it held so much potential. The screenplay was probably the worst part about it. It was filled with silly sequences and laughable dialog that just killed the mood of the movie. It seemed like the screenwriter had a good idea, he just didn't know how to develop it to stretch over a ninety minute running time. The second half of the film was running low on ideas, the twist was pretty obvious and the ending was awful. Joel Schumacher is responsible for one of the worst movies ever and he did redeem himself a little with Phone Booth and a few other films but The Number 23 reminds me that he's still capable of making a stinker. He has the movie drenched in style but he just can't get a good focus. He moves the film at a clunky and slow pace. He switches from reality to what's actually happening in the book which quickly got annoying. The actual book in the film that's titled "The Number 23" is an awful detective story and the audience gets stuck listening to Carrey narrate it which just bored me to tears. When Carrey is finally done with book, we get stuck watching him run around trying to solve the mystery. At this point, the audience has lost interest and there is no real tension. We impatiently wait for the movie to reach it's horrible ending and unconvincing explanation before celebrating that film has finally finished. The acting was mostly average and pretty forgettable. Jim Carrey was clearly just sleepwalking through his performance and he didn't even seem to be trying. He was either completely over the top in some scenes or just very wooden. His narration was a complete bore to listen to and he put no life inside his character. Virginia Madsen did the best she could with a limited role but she needs to pick better scripts. Logan Lerman was pretty bland as was Danny Huston. Overall, The Number 23 was an awful thriller that offered more laughs than suspense or thrills. Rating 3/10

Kissa

11/05/2024 06:39
If your toilet could write, it would write better scripts than this. Ned, the Dog, Guardian of the Dead, protected and produced stuff that's less stinky than this. If only there were negative numbers to rate with. A pretentiously "deep" film where Jim Carrey pretends to be real actor, and both fail miserably. A mysteriously psychic book that "Is just like my life" and supposedly like everyone else's (with murders, suicides, strange sex...Oh yeah, we all have those lives, don't we?) leads our "hero" into a convoluted trail of trying to free himself of obsession...no, finding a murderer...no solving a mystery...no getting a very large paycheck for a very lousy job. It is painfully obvious that the writer thought he was writing something wonderfully deep, and painfully obvious that Carrey thought he was finding something to express his hidden serious side and make his dramatic acting "bones", but the result is just...well, painful. I actually sat through the entire thing (though I must admit I TIVO'd it and could only take small doses at a time to avoid nausea, not from the violence but from the lousy "plot", such as it was) because I thought it would have a wonderful plot twist to somehow bring it all together like "12 Monkeys", one of my favorite films. That film is what this film dreams of being, a writing masterpiece where many pieces of a puzzle are mysteriously brought together and you gasp and say "Ah Ha!" at the same time. But the only resemblance between this and 12 Monkeys is that they both have numbers in the title and this is more like something monkeys...well, never mind. There is no such hope. This film which actually has humor in the beginning and makes you think it's going to be a comedy can never make up its mind what kind of movie it is. And you will wonder why you ever thought it was one. Avoid it. In fact, scold anyone you know who admits seeing it. The single clever piece in the entire film is the last second, after the live action when you get a quote from Scripture that may have given the author the idea for the thing. But that's as close to inspired as anything ever comes in this thing. And expired would be a more appropriate word.
123Movies load more