The Lion King 2: Simba's Pride

Please Upload This Movie In Hindi Also

i

Guys…theway Mufasa:TheLionKingwas 100x better than Moana2, it hit alltheemotional points, great songs, had a lot of heart and even tho I was hesitant about it kinda reinventing somelionkinglore it honestly worked great, loved it! Anyway def recommend seeing it

LionKing2:Simba’sPridedeserves sooo much more recognition and respect than people give it

Taking#MufasaTheLionKingas prequel2‘18#TheLionKing, not ’94 anim classic, made it/theCGI more palatable2me. Now wholly a morality tale. Animated action often2quickly sequenced, so that drama/rom. feels inadequately smushed in. But, TBH, unlikely I’d find it equal2orig

#MufasaTheLionKingis a step intheright direction compared to its 2019 predecessor.Theanimals this time around are more emotive, andtheoverall direction from Barry Jenkins helps make this film worththewatch just for that alone.Theperformances from Aaron Pierre and

To say that one of "The lion king" movies is disney's most underated movies might seem odd to you, but I really do think it is. This movie really concludes everything that is left unsolved from the first movie. At the end of the first movie peace is restored but the outcasts are still left to suffer, this is resolved in "The lion king II: Simba's Pride" This movie is all about teaching the watcher to be openminded and allow for second chances. The way this is written gives me chills, it's the most whole movie I have ever seen. This is my favourite movie not only because I grew up watching it but also because I still feel the way I did watching it the first time when I watch it now, even though I've watched it some 200+ times. Simply a masterpiece. This truly is disney's most underrated movie.

When I first saw the original 'The Lion King' in cinemas at the age of four, I'd been hooked. Ever since then, my favorite movie has always been this Disney classic. The sequel came out when I was seven, and for a cheaply made direct-to-video movie, was quite enjoyable to watch. Basically, the story follows on from the original film. To beat the original Lion King would be a near-impossible feat, so when put in perspective, the movie really isn't all that bad. The story is neatly tied in with the original film, with the concept of Scar, the antagonist of the first film, having a family bent on revenge over Simba, the protagonist of the 1st Lion King. The film can be very moving at times, and some songs I even preferred over the original's. However, this movie could have been so much more! Had Disney spent more time on it and released it to cinemas instead of having a direct to video release, this could have easily been just as good as the original. What brought this movie's rating down was the fact the storyline had a lot of unanswered questions - where was this pride int he rpevious movie? Many other gaps fill this film, and are far too vague for the viewer to assume what might have happened.

While it is true that the Lion King 2: Simba's Pride isn't near as powerful as the first beloved movie. But I don't mind of looking at the continuation of the story of Simba and his life of being the king of the Pride Lands of Africa. His daughter Kiara is a good character, at the beginning she was just like Simba when he was young and then she learns more about the responsibility of the royalty from her family. While being a promising feature the main problem for me and maybe others as well is that there isn't any time for character development. I mean the lion group of Zira didn't give any information's of how they were created exactly. All we know is that Zira was possibly the wife of Scar before he died. The same thing for Kovu, I wished they could have told more about him as well. If only they told more about these lions it would've been much more interesting. But apart from those the story is solid. I didn't find the story unnecessary or pathetic written, but it's a shame that there weren't any space for more character development. I know that many people will call this sequel only made for money, but If you look closer there are some good parts especially on the half to the end of the movie. The animation is neither the same great level as the first, but nothing awful to look at it's better than decent. Of course the part with the flames that were criticized for looking so ugly and not so well made. Yes I know that we miss the almighty Hans Zimmer and Elton John on this one, but the music isn't that bad. My favorite songs would be: He Lives In You, We Are One while the catchiest would be the Upendi song. Is it recommended? If you loved the original The Lion King there's nothing to feel it's unnecessary to look at the sequel. It's not perfect but I think it deserves to be seen for it's sophisticated characters and story.

Although I consider myself quite a big Disney fan, I usually skip the sequels - mostly because they seem awful from the trailers. Because I felt like watching a new Disney film, I said what the heck, and saw LK2, knowing they couldn't go too wrong in a sequel to their biggest hit. I'm a afraid I was proved wrong. I admit my expectations were low to begin with, but this movie sucks on so many levels. I have yet to see a sequel with SO many references to the original. Any character mannerism you can think of in the LK is here (including Pumbaa's flatulence jokes). It's OK if it's done subtly and in crucial points of the story, but it's there every two minutes and it's so tacky. I lost count of how many times someone hung off a cliff in this movie. The story is a rehash of TLK, only instead of hyenas you get the outlanders - a pack of lions and lionesses exiled from Pride Rock and led by Zera, the female version of Scar. There is an abundance of cringe-worthy moments, mostly thanks to the "brilliant" script (one such moment has Simba survive an attack by the outlanders and upon returning to Pride Rock, murmurs to his minions "Kovu... Ambush..." and bang, he passes out. It was worth it, I admit, I laughed out loud. Songs - usually they're the highlight in a Disney movie, not here. Whoever wrote the lyrics should be sued. "Upendi"? "Not One of Us"? I'm sorry, the Disney Channel's chicks offer better music than this. And that's saying a lot. Animation - as in most Disney sequels, the animation is Saturday-morning cartoon style, leaning heavily on cheap computer graphics that give it a sterile and stagnant look. No trace of the earthy, organic visuals of the 1994 classic. The characters, as you've probably concluded, look off model most of the time and move awkwardly. Disney should pay respect to their classics and avoid a sequel if it's not going to receive a normal treatment.