Rabbit Hole

Actor John Cameron Mitchell directs a wonderful film version of Pulitzer Prize winning author David Lindsay-Abaire's play which the play write adapted himself. Nicole Kidman (Becca) and her husband (Howie) have just lost their son and are trying to pick up the pieces of their lives. Slowly, the events of that terrible day are revealed and we see a family in distress. Nothing is working for Becca as she tries to come to terms with her loss. Howie remains in grief therapy after Becca bails, but neither can communicate with each other anymore. Becca finds little solace from her family and seeks out a young adult named Jason (Miles Teller) who was involved in the events that ended her sons life. Howie becomes involved with Gaby (Sandra Oh) a woman from his grief group. Both are reaching out to others due to the wall that their son's death has placed between them. In the end they are able to work through the wall and provide that healing touch that can only exist in their own relationship. This is certainly a Kidman tour-de-force, she produces and acts here for the first time in tandem. She hand picked Eckhart for his role, and from the dynamics of the two actors working together; made an inspired choice. Dianne Wiest as Becca's mother "Nat" was convincing as the, perhaps, not intellectual, but worldly sage who guides the hero (Becca) toward finding the answers she needs to heal both her life and her family. Sandra Oh delivers her usual spot on performance and new comer Teller is competent, but perhaps a bit lost in such a stellar cast as this. Nevertheless, this is a fine production and a deep film. The subject matter is far too deep for teenage date night, and perhaps too frightening for young couples. Individuals, like myself, who have lost a child of their own will appreciate it; as will others who know the healing process is complicated but can be achieved with hope and patience. Excellent film...

Rabbit Hole is a wonderful drama. I thought it might be good. I honestly didn't think that it could be that good. It's sad tale. The movie is more suitable to people who are more mature. People who have kids or who have lost someone really dear might find this one a real pleasure. Younger viewers who enjoy mostly American-pie-style movies don't find it much interesting. Everybody, who likes good dramas which are based on a tragic stories and concentrates on the relationships between characters, will fancy this film very much. Aaron Eckhart and Nicole Kidman are a great couple here. I clearly see why Kidman personally chose Eckhart to play his husband. They are so natural. It was pleasing to see those two together. A definite match. I must admit, the story is quite somber, but I found myself happy after seeing it. That's probably because I was fascinated by the great performances of both lead actors. It may work for you too.

Let me just start by saying that this is not a bad film. It is very well handled, both in terms of direction and the general tone (A surprising change from Shortbus director John Cameron Mitchell). The acting is absolutely impeccable, the photography simple and understated, yet perfectly controlled an absolutely right for a film like this. Even the music, by TV composer Anton Sanko,in its gentle form is carefully used and never falls into the cheap emotion stirring mode. So why did I just give it a 6 then, when everything about it seems ever so perfect? I supposed my argument against it comes down to the subject matter itself and the story. I am probably alone on this one, since the play from which the film has been adapted has won the Tony Award in 2007. Obviously somebody must have seen a lot more in it than I did. Somebody must have liked it a lot! It is essentially a film about grieving: a couple has lost their 4 years old boy in an accident and 8 months later they are struggling to cope with it. This is essentially the film. This is how much I knew about it before going into the theatre and this is exactly how much I still know about it after the screening. Despite the fact that the film is an incredible emotional experience (I pretty much cried non-stop from half way though right till the end), to me the film just went nowhere. I knew exactly what was going to happen before it happened… and probably because nothing really happened. Of course it'll make you cry. If I tell you a story for 2 hours about my 4 years old boy who died run over by a car, I'm sure I can make you cry too. You certainly can't judge a film on whether it'll make you cry or not. Of course, this film will stay with me for a while, but once again, this isn't certainly a mark of a good film either (I remember a lot of very bad films too). I can probably understand that this is exactly the point of the movie: when something like this happens, it's as if you fall in a state of trance and nothing really seems to happen anymore. Life stops and it doesn't matter how much you try to shake off the emptiness, life will never be the same again. I get it. And yet I hated it. Maybe I just resented it for being put in a condition where I had to watch people having to live this tragedy for 2 hours. This is one of the most depressing film I've seen in quite a while. In a way it reminded me a lot of "Revolutionary Road". But where that film had some sort of character development and skillfully managed to balance moments of comedy (however dark) to moments of high drama (thus elevating them and giving them more impact), "Rabbit Hole" is constantly depressing. It only seems to have one gear, travelling at constant speed to a place which is pretty obvious right from the start. It's a film with the same level of voice all the way through and after 2 hours of being told something pretty obvious, it does get all a bit tiring. Aaron Eckhart is really good, of course he is. This the typical Oscar worthy part, but I have to say, it's so much easier to play a character like this. I am not an actor and yet if somebody put me on a stage and told me "your 4 years old boy has died" I would be able to cry and shout and look the same way Aaron Eckhart did. The same goes for Nicole Kidman. I am not trying to take anything away from them, I am not saying they were not absolutely perfect in this film, I am just saying that the part of a grieving parent has got Oscar bait written all over it. Also, I must confess I was a little distracted by Nicole's lips too. All the way though the film I kept on asking myself " What the hell has she done to those lips…". Please Nicole, leave them alone! Have the courage to grow old, like any other human being. You are so good, even without Botox and surgery!! moviegeekblog.wordpress.com

Rabbit Hole-1080P

Rabbit Hole-720P

Rabbit Hole-360P

Rabbit Hole-480P

I have to say...I love Nicole Kidman, i really do. I think she's a real great actress and has a lot to teach us, and my favourite movie of her was Moulin Rouge...actually it's my favourite movie ever. But rabbit hole...it was really confusing. I started to understand the beginning in the middle of the movie, and the middle of the movie in the end, and the end was...i don't know there's nothing after that. I personally don't like Aaron Eckhart...something about him, about the way he acts that doesn't really catches my attention, and also because every time i look at his chin i want to grab it and open just to see what's inside it.Haha just kidding. But maybe i didn't like this movie because I'm not smart enough to understand it, or because i don't have that deep feeling. The only thing that i really enjoyed was the drawings, the art or whatever was that that was drawing. Sorry, Nicole, still your number one fan!

"Rabbit Hole" stars Nicole Kidman and Aaron Eckhart as a married suburban couple. As with all married suburban couples, there is more going on beneath the surface. Here, though, what's beneath the surface are insightful concepts, instead of additional plot lines. Becca and Howie are trying to find solace after their young son dies. This is an extremely well written film with smart, quick and funny dialogue, and intelligent subtexts to how and where to find solace. The brilliance of the writing allows these profundities to become the main reflection, rather than just their relationship. It's also a spectacularly acted and beautifully shot film; put together in a way that it wasn't obvious that it was based on a play. Similar to "Revolutionary Road"(2008) but set in modern times. Not very similar to John Cameron Mitchell's previous films ("Shortbus"(2006) and "Hedwig and the Angry Inch"(2001)), but shares the same intelligence just finally more accessible. David Lindsay-Abaire's screenplay rivals Aaron Sorkin's "The Social Network" for Best Adapted Screenplay of the year. Unfortunately, like "Doubt"(2008), which is also based on a play with a multi-layered story, lost to "Slumdog Millionaire"—the more popular film of its year, so will "Rabbit Hole".

The Hollywood's style in this modern era can be characterized as the blockbuster cinema, a high profit movie making machine mostly oriented in action and disaster genre. In that aspect there are however a drama genre, as well other classification. There are a lot of very good titles, and I was expecting so much from the trailer of the Rabbit hole. But instead I was totally disappointed. I am an admirer of Nicole Kidman's work, especially in her lately movies, where she as other divas like Merry Streep, Hale Berry, Sharon Stone and Kim Basinger are put on the place to express her character in drama context, as an personality characterization, rather that sex appeal. I am also very disappointed in Kidman as an person as she fake her face with botox loosing her real charm, make her so unnatural, less attractive and synhtetic. The rabbit hole is made as an psychological drama, but at the end I was so disappointed. Here we have so much impressed reviewers by that movie but I don't share that impression. I would rather described it as an effort, to make a good psychological movie, but with so much flawes and forced clishes to make a bad one. The acting where so unnatural and the whole concept is based on trying to make an image of presentation of the deepest feelings of the characters, while it stay so banal with well known Hollywood sweet bouquet. The story is good, and the intent is also good, but at the end, we have only an effort to touch something that is well known as an imitation of well established drama movies from European cinema. This is typical American movie, where you can see nothing more than shallow concept of movie artistry. Boring, expecting to something, and pretending like, is significant but general characterization of the Rabbit hole.