Pet Sematary II

Pet Sematary II_720p(480P)

source: Pet Sematary II

While shooting a horror film, the famous actress Renee Hallow (Darlanne Fluegel) dies in a weird accident. Her ex-husband, the veterinary Chase Matthews (Anthony Edwards) decides to leave Los Angeles and move with their teenage son Jeff Matthews (Edward Furlong) to Renee´s house in Ludlow to start a new life. Soon Jeff is bullied by his schoolmate Clyde Parker (Jared Rushton) and befriends the teenager Drew Gilbert (Jason McGuire). When Drew´s stepfather Sheriff Gus Gilbert (Clancy Brown) kills his dog Zowie, Drew buries his dog with Jeff in an ancient Indian cemetery that has the rumor of raising the dead. Zowie returns and kills Gus and they bury him in the cemetery. But soon the boys learn that sometimes death is better. "Pet Sematary II" is a forgettable sequel of Stephen King´s "Pet Sematary (1989). Directed also by Mary Lambert, the plot is weaker and unoriginal. The one-dimension lead actor Edward Furlong keeps the same expression when is happy, sad, bullied or whatever. My vote is five. Title (Brazil): "Cemitério Maldito II" ("Damned Cemetery II")

Most people didn't enjoy this movie at all. Maybe due to comparing it to Pet Sematary 1. But I actually thought this was as enjoyable as the first, and I know I'm in the minority there! Both great, both different. **SPOILERS** Jeff Matthews(Edward Furlong) and his father Chase(Anthony Edwards)move to get away from the Hollywood lifestyle after the death of Jeff's mother Renee, and meet Drew Gilbert, who's dog Zowey is shot and killed.....or is it? Jeff and Drew are told the story of the Creeds, and the Indian Burial Ground, where they buried Zowey. But then Gus(Drew's step dad) comes along and things get worse.Gus, although the bad guy for most of the movie, is a pretty cool character. Jeff gets the idea that since they brought Zowie and Gus back from the dead, he can do the same with his mother. And does so with the help of Gus. But is it a good idea? I really liked this movie, no matter how bad most others seem to think it is. But it's all a matter of opinion. I would personally give it 8/10.

Honestly i don't look into stories just a good movie, i'd say Clancy Brown made this movie excellent, he is just too hilarious.. this movie i like evenly with the first one, Furlong could've done a better job though, The movie itself is more graphic than the first was, showed more detailed deaths and showed something else kinda nice.. overall though this movie was a mix between funny, sad, and scary, which makes it one of my favorite sequels, i dunno why a lot of people disliked it i didn't see anything wrong with it at the least, just didn't have much to do with the main story possibly could've been it could've happened like that or this but it wasn't complete without Fred Gwynne in it, he was as awesome as Clancy Brown, whew enough blabbing, just highly recommended for people who love violence and killing movies

This was bad. It had potential but by the end it had gotten so over the top that I just didn't care what happened to any of the characters. The first one was relatively tame as far as animal gore but this one was stomach turning. If you're an animal lover you won't enjoy this because the animal gore is too much. Any movie that shows kittens ripped apart is just a no go in my book. Edward Furlong was a great child actor and had so much potential but Hollywood chewed him up and spit him out and he hasn't been in anything of note for a very long time. I was shocked to see that he is still acting! It's a shame to see talent go to waste. He looks like he's in his 50's and is bloated and a real mess now which is a shame because he was a cute kid. He was ok in this but towards the end he started acting really creepy like HE was one of the ones who had come back from the grave and it just didn't make sense. The kid who played Drew was awful! It was obvious he'd had no professional experience. The actress who played Drew's mom was bland. I can't believe she's still acting. I will point out the same thing I pointed out in the first movie - the trip to the burial ground is long and treacherous and you have to go up a mountain to get to it. We're supposed to believe that an extremely overweight kid would be able to carry his big dog all that way without his heart giving out?! And what about the step-dad? They dragged his huge body all that way themselves?! No. That's just not believable. That's why they didn't even try to show that happening on screen. And what about this - in both movies they say that "You bury your own." Ok if that's true then how did that class bully come back from the dead when Drew's step-Dad buried him? He wasn't the kid's dad so that was an inconsistency they overlooked. This wasn't bad in the beginning but it ran out of steam at the end and ruined what could have been a halfway decent movie. Take this one for what it was - a thrown together mess to capitalize on the success of the first one. And unless you have a good story with a good ending you're practically ensuring that it will turn out to be a dud. My suggestion - bury this movie...just not in an Indian burial ground because you don't want it coming back.

I like this movie. Has a few flaws though. First is; Yeah, I'll agree, a sequel to the original Pet Semetary isn't as the best of ideas. In the original, all the main characters bar one are dead so you can't use them so it will have to be a brand new story with brand new characters. As it is a brand new story, treat it as such and you will enjoy it. Like in many movies, I try to place myself in them and work out what I would do. OK I wouldn't have buried Gus nor the dog and nothing would have gone wrong but that would render the movie pointless. In making it, I would have left out the doggie dream and given Drew and his mother a better chance to survive. Said enough there. More gory, not as scary as the original but worth a look.

Have you ever watched a movie you wish you could just make go away? I mean not just away from your mind, but away forever like it never existed? That would be this movie for me. I hated it.. HATED it with a passion. The movie was beyond cruel and totally unnecessary. If you're an animal lover like me, you won't be able to sit through it. Heck, even if you just like animals.. it's still hard to stomach. I think whoever dreamed up this crap needs to have a lobotomy. Giving it an 1 out of 10 cause there isn't an option for 0 or I would have used that... actually a -578357834578437534 more like it. PUKE in it's worst form.

I have to say that Pet Sematary II was the biggest load of rubbish I have ever insulted my eyes with watching. I should have been forewarned with the bizarre spelling of "cemetery" -- why they didn't spell it correctly in the first place... I'll never know. What the hell was up with the ending credits with all that sad music and pictures of the people who died? It's not a -documentary-, it's a pathetic excuse for a thriller/horror film. The acting was dodgy, the script was bemusing and the plot was utterly ridiculous. The psycho zombie dog was mildly amusing, but I'm not sure it was supposed to be. What was the film trying to do? Was it a spoof of a horror film? It failed at an attempt to fit into any genre of film other than "trash". I found the entire movie to be contrived, boring and stupid, and I wouldn't watch it again even someone paid me!

So i sat myself down today to watch the sequel to the famous movie "Pet sematary" and expected a half-assed thing made only to drain a little extra money from the Pet sematary fans. I was positively surprised though as the plot was interesting(A widower vet moves to the village from the first movie together with his son to start a new life) and so was the characters. The actors was also good and performed excellent especially the guy who played Gus(cant remember his name). He manages to actually behave like a gleeful psychotic man without going so far that his performance would evoke laughter instead of shivers. His performance is without doubt the best part of the movie. This movie is more gory than the original movie and has less of the psychological terror elements that were a big part of the first movie although this is rarely taken too far, a few moments of the movie features over-the-top goriness but not enough to make it ridiculous in any way. To sum it up: Pet sematary 2 is a good horror movie featuring both psychological terror as well as gore, the simple yet interesting plot as well as the performance of the actors makes this a movie well worth seeing.