Pan

h guys please Hindi language dubbed in (pan) movie I kindly request for you to dubbed in Hindi language the (Pan) movie and thank you Soo much have a nice day ☺️

interesting movie

source: Pan

WHAT A MOVIE! I ONLY DIDN'T GIVE IT A 10, BECAUSE THE "BAD" IN THE MOVIE, ARE GOOD THINGS THAT COULD HAVE BEEN BETTER!Is hard not to compare with the first chronicles of Marnia movie and i really don't know why, but there are several similarities.Hugh Jackman is obviously sensational, Rooney Mara too, and she will shut the people who signed that ridiculous petition to change actress, Garrett Hedlund is good too, many people have denied that, but the character, in the way he is in the movie, it did get well played by Garrett, And the boy they have chosen to play Pan, Levi Miller, THEY COULD NOT HAVE CHOSEN ANY BETTER! He just rocked, is amazing how good he can act being that young. He was my first concern about the movie because the main acting is the most crucial, and it would be a kid, and is hard to find a kid acting good, so this was a crucial point that would be hard to make work, and they did, Levi Miller was just amazing, i think he can be the next DiCaprio, after all, looks like a young version of him, A LOT, jUS HOPE HE DOESN'T GET TO BE THE NEXT DICAPRIO BECAUSE....Oscar. Do i need to say any more? He also (last time i talk about his acting, u must be like "yeah we get it, the kid is good") rocks in the scenes which he's tied up and black beard is killing all the fairies, he cries and yells, ILL DO ANYTHING JUST STOP!! ANYTHIIING!! AMAZING! and when he meets his mom, cries, and show a perfect mixed expression of sadness, happiness, and satisfaction! this boy just...wow! Now i don't understand the reason of so much hate, there are critics that complain about the lack of magic and wonder in Neverland. What?! mermaids crocodiles, giant floating water balls, a "space" before Neverland, skeletal birds, the fairy kingdom, how is it without magic? And they also complain about the nirvana scene that doesn't make sense but....THE MOVIE DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE! U CAN SAY THE SCENE WAS BAD, BUT COMPLAIN BECAUSE DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE, COMPLAIN ABOUT THE WHOLE MOVIE THEN, WHAT THE HECK MAKES SENSE IN THIS MOVIE? I feel deeply sorry for the people who worked in this movie that i loved, and i have seen how hard they tried (i have came along with the news of this movie's production since December of 2013 when it was announced)and see how hard they worked, to get these reviews of the movie that i personally loved, made me feel kinda sad 4 them, also for Levi Miller, to know that his first major movie, that made him cry when knew he was gonna be a part of it, being so criticized, at least almost ALL the reviews are loving him as an actor, and trust me, this boy is gonna steal every1's heart!Lets see how he's gonna handle it

I saw this last night in a 3D theater. I was not expecting to like it, I was going more for the kids because they wanted to see it. I LOVED it. I have been very disappointed in 3D movies lately and this movie brought back my hope in quality 3D. I am beside myself on the reviews...... I really enjoyed it and would actually like to go see it again. I just wonder if it's going to be as good without the 3D effects. The story is really good. I love seeing Pan and Hook as friends and the story behind the story. Great acting from all actors. I fell in love with Tiger Lily. I hope to see a story of how they become enemies. I highly suggest giving it a chance.

Brace yourself to be blown away! But prepare yourself: it's a Joe Wright movie, so it's so different and perfectly magical, it will change your previous knowledge of who Pan truly is. If you are going to watch this movie you must know it's not a remake of Peter Pan, this is a story about who Peter Pan actually is, how he became "the Boy Who Wouldn't Grow Up" and how Hook became Captain Hook and who princess Tiger Lily is. It's amazingly beautiful and the soundtrack is phenomenal! My husband and I absolutely loved it. All I want by this point is part 2! I want Joe's version of how Wendy Darling enters the story.

When Mom and I decided to go to the movies last night I thought we might to go "The Walk". Instead we saw "Pan". To get me ready we watched "Hook", and few other earlier "Peter Pan" movies. I didn't understand why they needed to make a new one but this story was different. The other "Peter Pan" movies deal with The Darling family. This one featured Peter. The movie started out with Peter as a baby then moved into his transition of becoming an enchanted boy who could fly. Usually the bad guy in these movies was "Captain Hook" but in this movie Garrett Hedlund played Hook and trust me he was not bad at all. Rooney Mara was great as "Tiger Lilly." Hugh Jackman played "Blackbeard". I am not used to seeing him looking that ugly but he was good. Levi Miller did a great job as "Peter Pan". When you see these movies you don't realized that the actors are not reacting to anything initially. All of the creatures are put in later. THe special effects were beautiful. I loved all of the fairies. I also loved how the movie moved from an cold, sad London of WW2 to Neverland. It was great. This movie is rated PG and has a good story so if you want to take your family out for a cinematic treat this weekend. I think "Pan" would be a good choice!

If there was a more awkward movie than Pan released in the last few years I'd certainly like to know about it as Joe Wright's big budgeted wannabe franchise starter is a lavishly coloured and extravagant picture that lacks knowledge of what it actually wants to be or who in fact it's aimed at and judging by the films flopping at the box office the world over, it seems as though audiences too struggled to figure out who should be watching this revamping of J.M Barrie's classic material or why they should be watching it. Tonally all over the place and with a story that seems to meander about the motions until a highly lacking finale and lack of answers regarding certain story questions (a glaring one being how Hook and Pan in fact become enemies as they are adventures together here), for the first time in his quietly impressive directing career Wright seems completely lost within his narrative and fails to liven up proceedings despite throwing every known colour onto the screen, plopping in Nirvana songs and letting many of his actors ham it up to level 11 to try and cover up the fact Pan's story is actually rather dull in a world that should be anything but. Our Pan here is played by newcomer Levi Miller and the poor young performer labours in his first major turn injecting Peter with neither the charm, smarts nor emotion that was needed for the role. When you consider however how his cast alongside a horribly miscast double act of Garrett Hedlund (who continues to frustrate as a lead actor) and the beyond bad Rooney Mara, the child performer didn't really stand much of a chance. The films only saving grace acting wise is Hugh Jackman who has a blast playing Blackbeard the fearsome pirate who will stop at nothing to collect that sought after pixie dust but while he has fun it still doesn't make a whole lot of sense having Blackbeard in this beloved tale. Whilst normally it would not be something called out for by the masses it would've actually been nice for Pan to stick more closely to the original Peter Pan story that has enchanted readers and viewers for decades upon decades and while its commendable for a big budget film to take such a risk on a new take on a well-trod property, Pan is a stinging reminder of what can go wrong when money is thrown all over the place and scripts seem doctored to tick off as many set piece wish lists as possible and for the first time in his career Joe Wright has crafted an almost irredeemably bad piece of cinematic entertainment. All those seeking a Peter Pan fix are much better off seeking out a copy of Disney's beloved animated take or even the similarly styled Steven Spielberg event Hook. 1 ½ awkwardly used Nirvana song out of 5

We (1 adult + 3 x 12 year olds) absolutely loved this. Let me start by saying I am a fan of The Pan, and so was worried before seeing this that it would not come up to scratch. So we were lucky enough to win tickets of the preview, and I have to say I loved it. It was a film full of adventure and goes along at a cracking pace. There is not much back story or character development but the Pan universe is not supposed to be "Tolkien Deep". There is enough reference to JM Barrie's classic play and the iconic lines that we all know and love. The casting was good, the portrayal of the iconic characters was excellent. Ignore the negative reviews, leave the grumpy adult at the door and enjoy. NB: we saw this in 3D , and it was exceptionally good use of 3D visuals, I've seen a lot of 3D films (have 3D TV setup at home too) and rate this very highly for effects, I actually jumped/ducked on quite a few occasions!

Spoilers: I mention the 1960 Peter Pan, Barney's Christmas, the Chronicles of Narnia, the Oz Books, Alice in Wonderland, and Harry Potter. This movie tells me movies are getting better and better, and I like movies of this dynamic. What drew me in was Tiger Lily and probably Blackbeard. Peter was such a good actor and such a sweet boy. He actually began to look like Peter Pan, which reminds me of the 1960 version with the lady playing Peter. I remember Wendy was good in that one, too. I used to watch it at my aunt's and have seen it at school a few times for music. I also used to watch Barney's Christmas, which reminds me of that version of Peter Pan; I actually loved Barney until kids in school said it wasn't cool again and I finally seemed older. My favorite was after I came back from the bathroom (had to go twice tho it was so short) and saw Blackbeard together with Sam Smiegel. The dynamic of their acting was so good. I 1st connected with the character of Sam Smiegel. Then, I grew to find Blackbeard acted well, except of course that he killed Peter Pan's mother. If he didn't murder, I'd like him. I liked him as an actor. I figure they dumped his character as a murderer and made him a warrior. His mother was an innocent maiden or something. It's sad to say I liked Blackbeard and Sam Smiegel over all the others. Tiger Lily made this movie.. a movie. She is so beautiful and sound. She is an excellent actress. She was flawless and the best. She is a beautiful young girl. She's a wonderful budding actress. As a person, I think she is very kind, good, and cool, very deserving. I'd like to see her now next to other stars, like Chloe Grace Moretz, Bella Thorne, and the girls from Pitch Perfect 2. I don't know what would happen if she acted for Tim Burton, but he sounds like a tough director, maybe wants actors to be more independent to let their creativity out and make creative choices. I rate this a 10/10. It contributed so much intelligence to the world with the cool acting. I really truly like it and hope others found themselves in it, too, and look forward to more movies as good as this in certain ways. I read a review that said it didn't really cover much fantasy, and I'm beginning to think a lot of people agreed. Fantasies like the Chronicles of Narnia, the Oz Books, Alice in Wonderland, and Harry Potter provide more magical ideas. It's hard to say I'd watch this again on my own, Pan, tho I loved it so much. I go to the movies about every week, tho. I'm sure you could really get into this. You'd have to do a lotta work if no one else is as into it, like posting on the board. A lotta people were fans of things like Pirates of the Caribbean and Star Wars. ..I used to do this for Sweeney Todd, watch it a lot. It's a lotta work to make a movie, a good movie. I was hoping for more things like Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, like from Tim Burton since he does so much and you should always be moving up, knocking all the pins down, eventually, and getting there. I don't know who'd argue this popular belief that supposedly everyone loves. So, Pan is a good new classic work of art.