Omar

source: The Keeper: The Legend of Omar Khayyam

it is not difficult to criticize it. it is not a surprise to love it. far to be a real good film, it has the gift to be beautiful. for images, for story, for drops from Arabian Nights, for the presence of Redgrave and for remind the great Khayyam. in fact, more than a film, it is a fairy tale. tradition, from old recipes, with same charm but not the same science of detail like in the Modern squares from Orient. its subject it is generous - the survive of tradition. the stories - like the colors in a Persian carpet not always inspired used. but the result is decent and the beauty is more powerful against the not artistic high virtues. a film who could be useful. for remind old stories. for rediscover the Orient in a better light.

but seductive. for landscapes more than performances. for the noble idea and for the homage to Omar Khayam. for the presence of few good actors. for a different image about Orient , useful in period of crisis and confusion. more than a film, it is a sketch. not impressive, fake in many scenes, unrealistic and very simple. but interesting as sign for discover more about culture, civilization,poetry and Persian circles of knowledge . and each meeting with Vanessa Redgrave is a happy moment. this film is not an exception. short, a naive film. about a lost world, piece of contemporary way to discover and understand the essence of European civilization.naive. seductive. and useful. not exactly as entertainment. but for remember.

The Idea of the movie is great and in this short time Mashayekh has done a fine job, but the actors used very shallow dialogs and up to the point conversations which made them act not very naturally. the half Persian half English dialogs of the family was not done properly, why did Nader narrated the story in Persian and the old Grandfather in English? The most important thing that kind of bothered me throughout the whole story was that the third friend Nizam-ol-Mulk was not mentioned and we all know the famous friendship of the three students of emam mowafigh, Omar, Hassan and Nizam-ol mulk, and always read in books and heard that the person who gave power and wealth to hassan and supported Omar's research was Nizam who he was malekshah's Vizier.

The movie begins with this long haired, dorky kid whose an Iranian-American in search of his ancestry -- or something. His older brother gets hospitalized and begins relaying the story of Omar Khayyam to the kid. Surprise though! He dies about half way through and so the kid makes a trek to London to hook up with some old lady who has a copy of the book -- because no one else on earth could possibly possess such a thing. Lady tucks in the kid in front of the fireplace. Kid somehow ends up in Iran talking to his grandfather with a horrible, indistinguishable accent (by the way, everyone has a horrible accent in this movie) who completes the story for him. Meanwhile, the actual tale and life of the man gets lost between all this garbage. Is it there to fill time? I have no idea. I was tempted to stop the film after about 15 minutes but decided to see it through to the end. Glad I didn't pay for it. The only thing amusing about this is that the Sultan looks sort of like Steve O, but probably doesn't do anything demented involving staplers. This pic is bad even by after school special standards. Pick up a translation of the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam and read it instead. Nice movie for 5 year olds -- I guess. Creators were no doubt well intentioned, but when you're dealing with a man of this stature there's no room for error, otherwise it's just flat out disrespect. If you are a lover of Islamic culture and history just avoid this. Hmm -- and some of these overly positive reviews seem mighty suspect, especially when a couple are structured identically.

Writer/Director Kayvan Mashayekh has created a fine film biography of the 11th century poet/philosopher/mathematician Omar Khayyam and in doing so has presented his viewers with much food for thought. An Iranian immigrant to the US, Mashayekh set out to not only share the rich cultural heritage of his homeland, but he also found a way to make the story even more meaningful: 'The Keeper' refers to the member of Iranian families (or all families for that matter) whose role it is to preserve and share and perpetuate the history of the family, saving ties to the past to assure they never are forgotten. Oral histories these, but in Mashayekh's hands (with writing assists from Belle Avery) this story draws the viewer into an Iranian family's life of diaspora and the deep tug to remain connected its dazzling past. The film is timely to say the least, and the message is one that will benefit the audiences fortunate to see it in understanding a controversial country and its people. Young Kamran (Adam Echahly) sits beside the bedside of his dying older brother Nader (Puya Behinaein) attentive to the stories about the family's tie to the Persian poet Omar Khayyam. The oral history is parceled out as the older brother dies and when death prevents the conclusion of the history young Kamran sneaks away to England where he encounters an elderly heiress (Vanessa Redgrave) who shares with him the handmade book of the Rubaiyat of Omar Khayyam and directs him to its source. Kamran then travels to Iran to his elderly grandfather (Dariush Iran Nezhad) who rejoices in the fact that Kamran is so committed to the family history and proceeds to share the mysteries of the hallowed ancestor. This contemporary story serves as a reference point to depict the actual times of Omar Khayyam (Bruno Lastra), revealing the man's childhood with his commitment to learning and to his two close friends Darya (Marie Espinosa) and Hassan (Christopher Simpson). Omar pursues learning and Hassan follows soldiering: they both love Darya but she is sold into slavery. The chain of events is unraveled slowly as we see every step of Omar's education into astronomy, mathematics, philosophy and poetry. He is a Muslim who is a lover of reason and tolerance, a man who keeps his pledges of trust and honor and translates his emotions into poetry that will live far beyond his time. Persia is invaded by the Turks with Sultan Malikshah (Moritz Bleibtreu) and the sultan is wise enough to employ the gifts of Omar for his court. The ruthlessness of the times destroys much of the empire: the Christian Crusaders and the Saracens destroy the inhabitants of Jerusalem and the seeds of struggle that persist to this day are sewn. But above it all is Omar's commitment to reason and to tolerance and his power is felt both at the time of the devastation and even to this day. The film was shot almost entirely in Uzbekistan and other exotic locations not usually seen by US audiences. The added features on the DVD include a very fine commentary by the director and by an authority on Omar Khayyam who manages to give us a terrific history lesson! There are also production comments that share some of the coincidental beauties and difficulties in shooting this film. The actors are all fine: one wishes for more depth to their characters, which should have been the province of the writers. But the overall effect of this visually stunning film is one of reverence for Iran's past and for the legacy of Omar Khayyam. It is a fine story and an equally fine history lesson.

Before watching the movie I heard so many view points and finally I got the chance to watch it but it was awful trust me it was really a disaster.No part of this film is according to the historical facts specially about the life of the king and relationship between hassan sabbah and omar as far as it is written hasan omar and khajeh nizamolmolk were three old friends khajeh became the minister of the royal court and in one case he ruined the name of hassan sabah in the court that king intended to kill him in this caused the opposition of hassan with kingdom and it wasn't at all religious matter.Also there is no name from the famous Iranian people of that time in the film and the whole movie has concentrated on the love of omar to Darya. The biggest problem is about the Persian actors number of American born Iranians who even can't speak correct Persian.The scene which shows Iran creates a horrible image in the mind of the audience(it is more similar to a totally uncivilized place) meanwhile this has nothing even a little close to the truth. After all I can say the director has been completely unsuccessful in creating a good movie and has wasted the budget he could do such a better job....

When I first heard of this movie it was because of my iranian dad. I was fairly excited about it because of interest in history and the sciences but also because of my iranian heritage. When I saw the movie I was baffled with how on earth the director could get away with making such a crappy film. I mean.... the dialouge is worthless... the actors cannot act... (except the English lady whom we see in 2 minutes). I bet the only people who have given this movie a good vote are iranian nationalist or whatever... I am proud to see this movie for what it is rather than coming in my pants out of some nationalistic sensation that an iranian made this movie about an iranian. Don't watch it. Seriously... you WILL regret it (unless you're a homesick iranian who doesn't have any sense of aesthetics at all).

The movie in itself is not that bad. But the objection that I have is the way Omar was portrayed. The type of poetry written by Omar and many other Persian poets which use the terminology of wine, cup, intoxication, love, beloved and so forth are metaphors. Unfortunately, this movie looks at it from a literal point of view and assumes getting drunk results from drinking intoxicants and not from getting drunk when the love of God is poured into one's heart (a concept that rarely anyone can relate to). Omar like many other Persian mystics may not have believed in God the way Muslims at their time did. For them the concept of creator was not something imaginary (blind faith) but something that needed to be researched with love, devotion, and sincerity to be grasped. Unfortunately many Iranians who have come to hate the religion of Islam due to what has happened in Iran since the revolution are now trying to appreciate their heritage by analyzing them without the element of religion.

Wow, this turned out to be quite an interesting film! Through the first part of the movie, while the characters were being developed, I found myself wondering just where the film was taking me... and how long it would take to get there. By the second half though, the script proceeds quite well and leaves you with a feeling of just the slightest bit of understanding as to how things have developed not just within the Persian region, but all over the region. Initially I was kind of hoping more for the unveiling of the Assassins and all the action that would bring (this didn't really happen, though was touched upon briefly), but what I received was a tale told in two times of how people develop and affect those around themselves, as well as, within themselves. Don't get me wrong, the film isn't all philosophy, but it does weave a tale worth telling... if you pay attention. I really enjoyed the film once I came to the realization that it was not going to be action-packed, the tale itself was well worth it!