I Spit on Your Grave 2

Good day! ‎📲 Earn daily income using just your smartphone & Whats App no pay ments, no hidden charges. ‎👉 Join @dominusupdates on Tele gram for the link, guide & more free updates! ‎

I Spit on Your Grave 2_360P

I Spit on Your Grave 2

It was one of the best horror sadistic movies i have ever seen...it reminded me a lot ,hostel etc.....i was very happy that an innocent angel looking girl took this kind of revenge...not boring at all....i would definitely see this again!The plot is already described by the above reviews.A who wants to be a model but currently works as a waitress goes in a casting from perverted and sick Bulgarian scams.She is beer raped a lot of times and then she is kidnapped and find herself in Bulgaria Then all the revenge starts!this is a very intense movie,with a lot of violent scenes and could be shocking for some viewers who are not into this type of movies.

I am a huge fan of "woman getting revenge on her tormentors" movies. I loved the original I Spit On Your Grave and the remake was a nice surprise. I wasn't sure that a sequel to the remake was going to work since I feared that it was going to just be a rehash of the same old same old. I was mistaken. I actually prefer this film to the remake and even the original film. This is a brutal and relentless film that will make you wish it was over. Not because you want to end the suffering in a bad way but because it's so nerve wracking that you'll want it to end so you can take a few deep breathes and remind yourself that.... it's only a movie!

The variation from the original film is that the victim is an aspiring model in New York, who, while working as a waitress, sees a posting for free photographs. Of course, she is not suspicious, and the guys she meets are Eastern European bad guys. After the photo session, one of the nasty men shows up at her apartment and rapes her. Later on, she wakes up in Bulgaria without any explanation of how she got there. She is further tortured in the basement of a house and sexually assaulted by more evil men. The revenge scenes are brutal, most especially one involving a vice used on a man's most vital of organs. This ain't Hamlet; but apart from the endless screaming, which is exhausting, at least the lead actress looks good without clothes. A very average revenge movie, and a 5/10.

This movie just absolutely does not need to exist, so why does it? Nor did the remake of this dog excrement in first place. It's extremely uncreative: all it is is the exact same premise and more or less plot as both the remake and the original '77 movie. The only difference is that the gradient of excessive violence keeps sliding up, and that's it. How the hell is that possibly worthwhile to make into a movie? One of these pointless acts of violence involves crushing testes in a vice and I'm simply left wondering, what kind of self-respecting man would want to go see something like that and how does he not see how dehumanizing it is to him,? Because even if it is happening to a bad-guy character, the image in and of itself is still degrading. It's yet another grotesquely, pointlessly hate-steeped movie with hostile depictions of humanity. There's absolutely no political/social context going on right now that would justify this movie at all: rape rates have actually seen some of the greatest decreases out of all major crimes, and rape shield laws created to give added protection to the rape accuser have resulted in creating another class of victims in the falsely accused who now have inadequate defence and legal protection. The idiots who made this must have real good connections and must please some other sociopathic or hate loving and self-hating needle-wiener losers in the industry to get this excrement made at all, but who are they making this insult to intelligence, creativity, and humanity for? As mentioned above, it can't be for any decent, self-respecting men. And I don't see how most females can identify with it either since the vast majority of them never have been raped and never will be and how would they identify with a female protagonist like that anyway? Then who's the fanbase of this? It's goro and gore * dorks, mixed in with some femdom loving defects, that's who. And I'm just saying in the internet age can't these needle-wiener losers find enough real or at least real-looking snuff type stuff out there to satisfy them? They have to actually see it in a horrible movie too and annoy the rest of us decent people by all that has to accompany that, like movie posters, ads, and banners on websites? I hope these "fans" enjoy their systemic denigration as men and human beings by the corrupt movie industry among others, morons. If they like violence so much, why don't they just gauge out their eyeballs, since they obviously can't even see the things that actually do SPIT on them anyway. I suppose I shouldn't be too concerned; it's not like this excrement is going to be big at all or make any real amount of money. But still the fact that it exists at all is both unnerving and annoying.

I really liked Steve Monroe's remake in 2010 but I had severe misgivings about plunking down five bucks to see this sequel. The 2010 film was a jaw-dropping improvement on the original. The characters seemed three-dimensional, the situations way more tense and uncomfortable, and even some moral greyness toward the end of the film, which only drew me in more emotionally. When a movie is as in-your-face brutal as the ISOYG franchise is known for being, it walks a thin line --- at least for those of us who don't just want gratuitous rape and torture. Unfortunately, Part 2 fails to bring the most essential spice to this workmanlike stew: an engaging and realistic plot. This is partly a limitation of the ISOYG premise. How many locales can really accommodate this kind of story effectively? I would have been happy with another trip to Hicksville, but no...the sequel takes us to Bulgaria of all places (from New York, no less!) then situates a good part of the move in the underground sewer system. That's...a problem, for many reasons, but chiefly because most of the sets are so damn dark that its difficult to even comprehend what's happening much of the time. This brings us into a series of almost laughable "I've written myself into a corner" scenarios. Let's see...Katie, our heroine in Part 2, is kidnapped from her apartment by three Slavic types (and that's all they are...TYPES). One kills her next door neighbor. They somehow magically get his body out of the apartment with little detection in the middle of the day. OK, fine...it can happen if you're lucky and a really seasoned killer. Then, Katie awakens in an underground basement/torture chamber in...yes..Bulgaria. How did she get there? Well, trust us...it's possible. Not likely, but possible. Then, she goes to the cops but is waylaid by a blond Butch woman who just happens to be the mother of the guy who killed her boyfriend. OK, maybe she could have been sent there by the guys, probably was, but...what are the odds her attacker would have a cop for a mother...really? That's not even counting the payback part of the picture where Katie suddenly becomes a survivalist (sorry, hailing from Missouri and being able to rig a mouse trap doesn't cut it) so tough that she can live in a sewer, construct elaborate torture devices, set them up down there.... This movie keeps asking you to buy holes in the writing so often that you could create a drinking game out of it. Then we have Jemma Dallender's performance, which I have to say is actually fairly strong considering the crap she's been given for dialog. Where the original gave some very strong stinging barbs for Butler, Dallender is virtually left to repeat LINE BY LINE everything....and I mean EVERYTHING...her tormentors said to her. Must have saved a lot of time on the screen writing budget but it's a snooze for us. 2010 had very innovate revenge traps that were custom-tailored to the villains. Here it's strictly by the numbers standard torture pot pourri. At the end Dallender is literally only screaming her lines...she substitutes volume for intensity and it doesn't work but really...wouldn't you be a mental wreck trying to carry this four star disaster? I'd like to completely blame Monroe but this has Zarchi's mediocre stink all over it. Maybe his social security payments have dried up.

In New York, the teenager Katie Carter (Jemma Dallender) is an aspirant model that works in a restaurant. She is advised to prepare a portfolio with a professional photographer to have a chance in the fashion world but she cannot afford to pay about two thousand-dollar for a session. She sees an advertisement of the photographer Ivan (Joe Absolom) offering free photos and she contacts him. She goes to his studio and his brother Georgy (Yavor Baharoff) welcomes Katie while their brother Nicolay (Aleksandar Aleksiev) is sleeping in a corner. Ivan asks Katie to wear less clothes and she gives up of the session. On the next day, Katie is surprisingly visited by Georgy that insists to give a flash memory with her photos to her. Katie accepts and during the night, Katie is surprised with Georgy in her room. She screams and the super Jayson (Michael Dixon) comes to her apartment but he is stabbed to death by Georgy that rapes Katie. Georgy calls his brothers and Ivan drugs Katie to clean the mess. When she awakes, she is in the basement of a house being successively abused by the brothers. Katie escapes but she discovers that she is in Bulgaria. Detective Kiril (Georgi Zlatarev) does not trust on Katie and calls his acquaintance Ana (Mary Stockley) that offers to take Katie to a shelter to have a bath and then to the American Embassy. But when Katie arrives in the shelter, she discovers that she is back to the same basement she had fled.. The brothers sell Katie to the violent middle-aged Valko (Peter Silverleaf) that tortures her before raping. Then the brothers bury Katie in a box in the basement; but the floor collapses and she survives in old catacombs and helped by Father Dimov (Valentine Pelka) that offers food and clothes to her. When Katie is physically strong, she plots an evil revenge against those that have tortured her. "I Spit on Your Grave 2" is a rough movie about torture and revenge and not for everyone since sensitive viewers will certainly be shocked with the violence. Movies about revenge are usually attractive, maybe because many people do not believe in justice any more, and "I Spit on Your Grave 2" is no exception. The storyline is the same of the original movie and its remake, i.e., woman is abused and tortured by many men and succeeds to escape from her captivity and kills them one by one. However, the story and screenplay is different from ""I Spit on Your Grave". All the cast has great performances but the unknown Jemma Dallender is impressive. The plot has holes - for example, why Kiri has not connected to Nicolay that was murdered in a night-club, or why he did not connect the dots to Ana after having a conversation with Father Dimov? The conclusion also disappoints but this movie is not bad. The problem is that as I have previously mentioned, the viewer must have stomach to bear the cruelties. My vote is six. Title (Brazil): "Doce Vingança 2" ("Sweet Revenge 2")

'I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE 2': Four Stars (Out of Five) Sequel to the 2010 remake of the 1978 cult classic 'DAY OF THE WOMAN' (which was later retitled 'I SPIT ON YOUR GRAVE', to capitalize on it's notoriety). All three films are torture/revenge movies about a young woman who is brutally raped and left for dead (by four men) and then she hunts them down, one by one, and gets her gruesome revenge. This film is less a sequel (as it's only similar to the 2010 film in title and premise) and more just another remake of the original film (it's even credited as being based on 'DAY OF THE WOMAN' in the film's end credits). It was written by Neil Elman and Thomas Fenton (who also co-wrote the torture * sequel 'SAW IV') and once again directed by Steven R. Monroe (like the 2010 film). This sequel is about as well made and effective (at the genre it's trying to represent) as it's two predecessors. Definitely not an enjoyable film going experience (in any way) but it delivers the gore, disturbing terror and grindhouse style revenge thrills that viewers of these types of movies expect. The story revolves around an aspiring model named Katie (Jemma Dallender, who gives an amazing performance) working as a waitress in New York. She calls the number for an ad, which promises free professional photos, and meets three brothers (Yavor Baharov, Joe Absolom and Aleksandar Aleksiev) in the studio they shoot out of. After they try to talk her into doing some photos naked she leaves and goes home to her apartment. One of the brothers, Georgy (Baharov), shows up at her apartment; first to offer her free pictures and then later taking photos of her, in her bedroom, while she's sleeping. He proceeds to tie her up and rape her and then calls his brothers for help cleaning up the crime. The three brothers drug Katie and ship her to their home country of Bulgaria where they proceed to rape and torture her. A business associate of theirs, named Valko (Peter Silverleaf), joins them in Bulgaria. Of course you know what happens next. The original 1978 film is one of the most controversial films of all time and has been criticized both for exploiting rape and man hating (due to the evil characterisations of it's male characters and the excessive torture scenes of them, some involving their genitalia). Roger Ebert notoriously called it a "vile bag or garbage" and gave it (and it's original remake) a zero star rating. The 2010 remake received the same kind of harsh criticism (and there were reports of several men walking out on screenings of that film in theaters) but both films also have received an equal amount of praise, with some calling them 'pro women' feminism and cathartic. I haven't read the reviews on this film yet but I imagine it would get the same kind of reaction. I basically felt the same things about it as I did the first two films; I felt miserable the first half of the movie but did get a decent amount of gratification from Katie's brutal revenge in the second (and the death scenes are once again extremely creative and grotesquely imaginative). Once again I don't think this movie (like the others) is telling anyone how to feel about Katie's actions (whether they're right or wrong) but it does make a compelling and disturbingly entertaining flick. Not a great film but a more than decent example of the 'torture *' genre (just like it's two predecessors). Watch our movie review show 'MOVIE TALK' at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQkUJbRVsoM