Hot Summer Nights

Hot Summer Nights_360P

I need in Urdu doubling

Hot Summer Nights-1080P

Hot Summer Nights-720P

Hot Summer Nights-480P

source: Hot Summer Nights

Small town local young heartthrob Cannabis seller teams up w/nerdy reject to expand his business. Nerd ends up over his head while also chasing the local female femme fatale. Acting was good; backdrop tunes were OK for the '90s setup. Problems: A lot of wasted time on scenes that didn't contribute, i.e. overhead shots of a beach as well as a hurricane, and the sense of it being a hot Summer, none played a role in the story. In fact the hurricane, Bob, technically was a bust for a hurricane. A lot of the important character background was written & edited poorly, just sporadic bits here & there which made the story flow disruptive & confusing. Drug scenes, and party scenes were all pretty predictable. Major problem: The ending for all major characters went no where, and the death which occurs towards the end, could have been prevented knowing it's coming, and they have a gun. Didn't make any sense.

The romance of the couple vs disapproving brother is a familiar story. If the cast was more appealing it might have worked. But here they all don't look right. Alex Roe isn't cool or dangerous looking. He's just like an Average Joe from South London. Maika Monroe isn't too alluring just druggie type. No chemistry with the too wimpy looking Timothy Chalamet who isn't up to playing teen romantic lead. The violence feels contrived. The obtrusive music and dark lighting don't help. And the jumping back and forth is so confusing. Don't bother.

Timothee Chalamet was the reason I wanted to watch this. I think he is very talented and has a great onscreen presence. So I have to say I was really disappointed in this film. I've liked all the films I have seen him in so far but honestly I didn't think his performance in this was that great. Something was missing. This movie had a lot of potential and overall wasn't bad but it missed the mark. The unknown kid narrating the movie was a strange choice. I've seen other films where a younger kid has narrated the film but we knew who they were because the director worked them into the film. Why would the director have this kid be unseen and unknown? Yes the lead female is cute but the narration went on for far too long about how insanely gorgeous she was and it just didn't fit with the movie. She was cute and perhaps for a small town she might have been the be all and end all but I've seen way more good looking girls than her. And for all the talking up about her looks I didn't feel like she matched up with the description. There should have been something otherworldly insanely hot about her in order for it to have made a deeper impact. She was annoying and bratty and it would have worked better if she had been a little more relatable and nicer. I didn't think that there was much chemistry between the female lead and Timothee Chalamet. The previews made it look like it was gonna be so steamy and hot but I don't know - it just fell flat. You know what was good about this film - Alex Roe. HELLO! This guy! I mean he is very good looking and he did an excellent job in his role. I hope he gets more roles in the future because he has great screen presence. He is in a tv series called Siren and he is completely different in that than he was in this film so he definitely has acting range. I didn't think the younger "bad" guy was all that great. He was annoying and it didn't seem like he knew how to act. His performance made me think they just grabbed a local townie and asked him to be part of the film in order to save money. He didn't seem old enough to be in that role and he didn't seem to be very intimidating. Why didn't the Alex Roe character fight back at the end? It seemed like he was getting his life together and he had found a girl who he was happy with and then he just allowed himself to be killed. It didn't match up. And the ending was trying to be all mysterious and something it wasn't. We are expected to believe this young kid would just leave town and no one would ever hear from him again? That's just not believable. I can't say I would recommend this film.

This is a critic's review on a film called 'Hot Summer Nights' - criticized the whole affair as "empty," and referred to the film as "A sweaty pastiche that shares its protagonist's desire to be all things to all people, only to wind up losing any sense of itself along the way." - - OK, so he - this is why critics "most that is" cannot be trusted; lets break this down, he says, this is empty, so because its empty that means its a bad film , really? so a "full" film is good. what does empty or full even mean? The film was richly layered bolstering the entire gambit of our human condition. Next, A sweaty Pastiche that shares its protagonist's desire to be all things to all people - So if the protagonist is perhaps diffident, cordial, thoughtful and in his desire to please everyone totters and makes a few mistakes, this makes him a bad character, thus empty, thus a badly composed story? what? Yes his empty, he then finds a jot fulfillment coming from pretty much nothing at a time when life was pretty dang hard, lots of people not many jobs, high rent coupled with paltry wages, born poor makes someone a bad character? Then he says, only to end up losing any sense of itself (what is "itself" is he referring to the movie, the plot, the character development? The protagonist was the best part of the tale; in fact if not for him, we would not have a story to unfold... The protagonist as it were, went from the kiddy pool of to the biggest darkest ominous ocean - and saved him self from drowning with a mysterious ending. Hot Summer Nights is intriguing and captivating. so what is the problem? All the components are there to relate a tale. Now if the critic had said, yes, it was a story and I did not find any plot holes or the continuity was pushed a little bit here and perhaps there, or the writer tied the threads but I just didn't like it and here are the reasons: Now that is a critic, hell yeah! But to discount and discredit the writing, the directing, the cinematography, the acting for what seems to be personal issues, that's not a critic, that 's a toolbox - step down sir, cause you cannot express yourself from an impartial plane, because if you could you would not try to foist your lamo pseudo intellectual nonsense about how to compose a film when you know absolutely anything about the writing process! This gem kicked ass from beginning to end: and Timothée Chalamet has definitely proven himself as the next big thing in Hollywood. So looking forward to following his career. Anytime his handsome mug (not saying that when he gets old it will be different, no in fact, he will probably be better lol) but one thing is for sure, he shant EVER need the assistance of any Hollywood neon sign from which to shine, for when he makes his presence in any scene, make sure to have some shades handy, cause this superlative thespian will surely light up the sky! Superstar on the real!