Hot Bot

ccvfdhhkru

source: Hot Bot

I think the only thing that can be considered to have been done right is the Hot Bot. I think you cannot argue that she is hot. But casting someone who doesn't do nudity in the main role of a movie like this, is a bit wrong. Especially because there is nudity here by other actresses. Not to mention that while there is almost nothing happening here (kind of literally, which is "funny" in a bad way considering the very naughty beginning), the jokes are badly written too. I guess this is supposed to be a sort of remake of an 80s movie with Kelly LeBrock in the main role. Mix in a bit of Superbad or something recent and you have a winning formula, right? Well unfortunately wrong, which is a shame indeed. Not funny or hot at all, which is kind of hard to achieve (no pun intended) if you think about it ...

A highly advanced prototype female sex-partner robot, en route to a sleazy senator, falls into the hands of two teenage virgin nerds. Hilarity ensues. When I say "hilarity ensues", what I mean is that this teenage sex comedy has a complete absence of humour. And often, with unfunny comedies, you can see where they are meant to be funny but aren't: here you can't even see those moments. Also, like many such movies, it wimps out on the sex, too - the film is pretty chaste. And, while we're at it, it's low on teenagers... But I am mostly concerned with nerd Leonard (Zack Pearlman). We have skinny loser nerd Limus and fat loser nerd Leonard. Now, if you are a fat loser nerd - a fairly heavy burden to struggle through your teenage years with - why on earth would you add to it by being an aggressive A-hole fat loser nerd? This character was horrible - obnoxious and just plain unpleasant to be around - and made a bad movie much, much worse.

Sometimes I enjoy silly movies on my laptop playing in the background while I play a PS4 game on my TV and don't need audio(ADHD? YES!) and only need to pay half attention....this movie is semi-watchable, and I've seen much worse...this film is not memorable...unless you really want to challenge yourself in discipline... Although there are plenty of named actors and semi-stars you've heard of and seen before, they lead you to thinking, "How much were they paid? Was it worth it?". It is a VERY BASIC remake/re(IMAGINING) of Weird Science, (Which is not amazing!...but very enjoyable in viewing with full attention!) ...also any movie that starts the description stating A HILARIOUS COMEDY.....You should be wary off the bat...GOOD LUCK!

Not as half as bad if you are in the right mood for the kind of the movie as it is kinda refreshing after all the "great" comedies in the last few years as it's purely stupid fun.

A German company manufactures a sex robot (Cynthia Kirchner) and it is sent to a US senator ( Larry Miller) who doesn't get it. Instead it lands in the hands of two dorky teens (Zack Pearlman, Doug Haley) who try to hold on to her as a dysfunctional FBI comes after them. There was a lot less sex and nudity that one would expect from the title and DVD cover. One can't help but make comparisons to "Weird Science" an 80's PG-13 classic "teen sex comedy." The humor was more juvenile than clever, overusing shocking sexual statements as a source of cheap jokes. We know how these films always end. I felt uncomfortable while the teens sat there and swore at their parents, calling them stupid while using profanity. While I don't mind profanity, especially when the Bot used it, their using it in this scene sucked the humor from it. This may have a lot of teen appeal. You might want to consider watching "Weird Science" again if you're over 30. Guide: Plenty of swearing, some implied sex, brief Cynthia Kirchner (or body double) nudity. Chasty Ballesteros provides early hot Asian tease nudity.

Let me count the ways: - What really surprised me was the city, the surrounding locations and the suburbs, they were of an ugliness seldom seen. It made me sad and suicidal. What saved me is that I realized i didn't have to live there. The two main leads are ugly. I mean, you know how in Superbad they're SUPPOSED to be ugly, but they have a certain kind of charm? That's totally missing here. Here Nard and Huff are just simply unattractive ugly. The robot is a bit ugly, she looks too ..... chiseled? Gaunt? Cold? Robotlike? I don't know, but it's not soft and appealing. The script is totally predictable, boring and lacks any effort for surprise. A movie about a sexrobot and there's no KISSING??? It's a prudish script with predictable near kissing only found in Disney movies for the under 12 demographic. Then there's the usual bully, the hot girlfriend, who INEXPLICABLY is interested in a real loser like Huff, who is also ugly. This is not one those movie where it is so bad it's good. This is just bad all the way. 1/10 The Melancholic Alcholic.

saw the trailer and it seemed like a movie that is written by a 10 years old nerd with robot sex fantasy,as a movie buff myself i seem to absorb everything in the movies first 5 minutes, this movie seemed pretty cool name wise but ewe no i wouldn't watch it. first of all the robot is not that pretty,secondly, i haven't seen any past Hollywood movie that doesn't have the same theme of robot thirdly the movie is loads of unnecessary comedy the same you would try to impress your grandma with. ultimately its quiet embarrassing for the writers and directors to have the audacity of finally releasing this movie to the audience which i bet would be bunch of ants

I am a very forgiving reviewer--I can usually find something to like about a film. In this case the only reason it gets 3 points at all is due to the premise, but as far as the plot, the characters, the dialogue--and as another reviewer puts it, the execution, it is a genuine stinker. None of the characters are likable, not even the robot or the kids. I have no issue at all about sexbots, nor do I have a problem with evolving AI--especially as they are likely a near reality, but the WAY in which this story was told was just terrible! As is often the case, the kids are too precocious, but even given that, they simply aren't believable--in their actions, their dialogue or their acting. I mean usually, the writers at least make the main kids likable or endearing in some way. In this movie, the one "nice" lead, is just too, too much to be believable, and the whole religious spiel in the middle of the film as a plot device? Ugh. To be fair, I can't decide if it's the acting that is off, or the directing--as if that ultimately matters in a film this bad (I can forgive either one if other elements make up for it) but the dialoge and development sure don't help. All of the other characters are pure (and poorly done) stereotypical caricature. The entire thing reads as a throwaway script in some slush pile. Now it's obvious that this film is aimed at young pubescent boys, but I doubt even that demographic would enjoy this film. There isn't enough substance--or visual candy in here to be even mildly titillating. This movie offers absolutely nothing to the audience. My recommendation is to just pass this one by--pubescent boy or not-- cause if you ARE a pubescent boy you will be sorely disappointed.