Frost/Nixon

source: Frost/Nixon

the tension is its great virtue. the tension of dialogue and the tension of acting. the memories of the viewer about Nixon administration and its end and the remarkable way for become the American president of Frank Langella. it is a story about truth. and about a man looking to save his thoughts more than his public image. a duel who, more important than the revelation about facts from the backstage represents the meet from two admirable actors who recreate not only a battle but discover the force, the tools, the strategies and the patience, the challenges and the mix between two different visions about duty, errors, fundamental decisions. and about the other. a slice of history. or a moral lesson. Frost/Nixon is both.and, maybe more important, one of films who redefine the role of cinema.

Both characters in real life (Frost and Nixon) might be described as slime-balls. You'd therefore think a film with them both as lead characters would be a real no-no. Actually, this is a very well constructed depiction of a real life set of events. It doesn't matter whether there are non-factual links, it all makes perfect sense. Frank Langella is absolutely perfect in his role as Nixon. I was almost convinced into liking the old rogue - you see, perfect tricky Dickie for you! I've never liked Frost the person and knew that Sheen would be able to pull off this character just as he has tackled other real life characters that are equally shifty. Brilliant. I do recall in fact seeing some of the real life television coverage of Nixon and was reminded of this during the screening. It fitted perfectly. A must go and see, it's a cracking story.

A perfect gathering of unbeatable artists who can make a role forever remembered. This film really makes a true bid to the actual events which happened. Even though its a full reel of conversations and emotional drama, I enjoyed this through out. Always Ron Howrad has been amazing in creating films which has huge acting output. Like A beautiful mind, Da vinci code etc. Like those this is one of his finest product. The major attraction of this movie taken away by Frank Langella & Micheal Sheen, I really admire Frank Langella's acting in this, its so emotional and real. As the character goes by the exact emotional reflections can be taken out from his face. Kevin Bacon, Oliver Platt and every other cast did their part very well, in the matter of acting the movie goes up in the air for the dedication 8 out of 10

As powerful of a performance from Frank Langella (I can see him accepting an Oscar, though I still hope it goes to Sean Penn for 'Milk') as Richard M. Nixon in 'Frost/Nixon,' one must not forget Michael Sheen's almost equally commanding portrayal of David Frost. It was suspenseful at times (admittedly, I have little background knowledge on the whole Watergate scandal, as I had little to go on with Ron Howard's other films: 'Apollo 13' and 'A Beautiful Mind'), had some punch in the dialogue, and a great score. I've heard the interviews were switched around for dramatic effect, and though disappointing, I understand how film (usually) has to have climaxes. That being said, already self-stated ignorance of the controversy, and as in the case with 'Apollo 13,' it was fairly predictable towards the end. But the good completely outweighs the bad, and the movie as good as it was, should be, at very least, viewed for Langella and Sheen's mesmerizing performances.

As a film it's just OK, a bit trite and under-explored but the bottom line is that Langella's performance is just not Nixon. I thought that Hopkins did a bad version in Nixon (1992), but this makes him look spot on. I understand that actors can take things as they will and sometimes it works (in the 80's I saw David Bowie do Elephant Man on Broadway with no makeup and he pulled it off) but I don't believe at any time or place that this is Richard Nixon. His voice, mannerisms, look, etc, are all wrong or just vague characterizations of the ex President. If your going to do somebody who's as well know for the way he acted it needs to be better than this. Worst impression since Val Kilmer as Jim Morrison. At an early point it becomes a distraction and colors my opinion all the way through. OK film, bad Nixon.

Disappointing film which chronicles the famous David Frost/Richard Nixon television interviews. The film is basically a dud since we already know how devious and vicious the late president was and Nixon was really suffered from a dull personality. Frank Langella, who portrays the 37th president, is very wooden in the part but I guess that is what you would expect. Pat Nixon's role was never able to evolve in this film and the way the interviews are conducted are unduly boring. By the time that Nixon admits that he let the country down, we may not even care about this. Gerald Ford was criticized and ultimately lost the 1976 election because of the pardon of Mr. Nixon. I can't really pardon Ron Howard for making this film. San Clemente never looked more beautiful, but that's about it.

I just saw Frost/Nixon last night and it was a great treat ! I wasn't familiar with this story prior to seeing the film , but did know something of the story .Of course I knew about Nixon and Watergate but only knew Frost as rather a buffoon type talk show host, this film documents the story in gripping fashion .The way Frost suddenly pulls it together at the final moment is rather unbelievable , but Langella's performance seems to override all .He captures Nixon's frailty , his humor , his insecurity and his demons in a simply great performance .The actor who plays Frost does well but the film doesn't really go to deeply into the Frost character , but clearly this is the moment of Frost's life .He risked all on this , money, career and reputation .The result in the end was a history making event .See it Langella is unforgettable .

As I look down the list of Ron Howard films, I find one guilty pleasure (Ransom), but nothing that equals the achievement of this film. With Frost/Nixon, Howard has joined the ranks of the great directors. He has made a film that is truly superb. While I still tend to prefer The Reader over this film, it is definitely worthy of many awards. As to the acting Oscar, it will be extremely hard to find someone more worthy that Frank Langella. He WAS Richard Nixon in this film, and his performance is what will make it memorable. I want to see it again just to see him. Oliver Platt is always enjoyable, and was so here. Kevin Bacon was magnificent, too. He was certainly more deserving of a nomination than anyone from Tropic Thunder. Despite the fine acting performance, I found myself walking out thinking about Rebecca Hall. I have seen her once before, but I did not remember her. I will not make that mistake again. A truly memorable experience on all counts.

This film is about a British talk show presenter preparing for the make or break moment of his career, and creating a memorable interview in the television history. I worried that "Frost Nixon" would be boring as it was based on a TV interview, but I am glad I was wrong. "Frost Nixon" turns out to be engaging and emotional. Despite the sedentary nature of the film, it never feels boring. There is a lot of intellectual war going on which makes it engaging to watch. Frost's initial interviews are well done to show how Nixon has the upper hand. It captures Frost's despair and enormous stress perfectly, and I felt sorry for him to ruin his career and his pocket. Nixon's tough and confident image is contrasted by an emotional speech at the end, which stirs up much emotions. It is remarkable that the emotional climax is filled with much silence, contrary to most of the movies out there. This is the beauty of great direction and execution.