Eye for an Eye

nice movies

Eye for an Eye-480P

Eye for an Eye-480P

Moviecut—Eye for an Eye

Well where do you start? Well let's start with the terrible acting which was way beyond wooden, in fact quite unforgiving really! Dialog, must have been written by the directors 5 year old. Special effects, not so special really! Sound, some of the worst sound production quality I have ever heard, ever .... no seriously I mean EVER! It needs a review all to itself, sound levels up and down from minute to minute, times where the dialog has clearly been recorded in a toilet cubicle! The sound engineer should seriously hang their heads in shame. Storyline, well there was some semblance of one which in more competent hands might have been half decent, unfortunately for this movie and the viewer these certainly weren't competent ones. Action scenes, good lord help us: no amount of good acting were that possible in this movie could have prepared me for how bad the fight scenes were going to be, I am still trying to get over it to be honest. In short, do yourself a favour and gives this a pass, unless of course you are one of those folks who go into a movie thinking it can't be that bad, OK but I did warn you ...

Stacy (Alex Sturman ) worked deep cover for the CIA in Tunisia. When a routine mission goes bad, Stacy is accused of having "the list" of Russian operatives and being part of a shadow organization. So they imprison her? Let dismiss her from the CIA and let her go live under a new name in Los Angeles. Then her past catches up to her as folks want that file and think she has it. I liked the plot twist. I would have liked someone like Scarlett Johansson or a martial arts expert play the role. Stacy really sucked at the fight scenes. And maybe Samuel L. Jackson being the CIA man. He could even wear an eye patch. This had the potential to be a classic series with the right people. As such it will be a forgotten film. Guide: F-word. Sex on film. No Nudity.

This film is definitely worth watching, good script, good acting from both the main characters and the supporting cast as well. It will keep your attention. Check it out!!!

Stacy (Alex Sturman ) worked deep cover for the CIA in Tunisia. When a routine mission goes bad, Stacy is accused of having "the list" of Russian operatives and being part of a shadow organization. So they imprison her? Let dismiss her from the CIA and let her go live under a new name in Los Angeles. Then her past catches up to her as folks want that file and think she has it. I liked the plot twist. I would have liked someone like Scarlett Johansson or a martial arts expert play the role. Stacy really sucked at the fight scenes. And maybe Samuel L. Jackson being the CIA man. He could even wear an eye patch. This had the potential to be a classic series with the right people. As such it will be a forgotten film. Guide: F-word. Sex on film. No Nudity.

Well where do you start? Well let's start with the terrible acting which was way beyond wooden, in fact quite unforgiving really! Dialog, must have been written by the directors 5 year old. Special effects, not so special really! Sound, some of the worst sound production quality I have ever heard, ever .... no seriously I mean EVER! It needs a review all to itself, sound levels up and down from minute to minute, times where the dialog has clearly been recorded in a toilet cubicle! The sound engineer should seriously hang their heads in shame. Storyline, well there was some semblance of one which in more competent hands might have been half decent, unfortunately for this movie and the viewer these certainly weren't competent ones. Action scenes, good lord help us: no amount of good acting were that possible in this movie could have prepared me for how bad the fight scenes were going to be, I am still trying to get over it to be honest. In short, do yourself a favour and gives this a pass, unless of course you are one of those folks who go into a movie thinking it can't be that bad, OK but I did warn you ...

Sadly this film could have been many hundreds of times better if the sound department (Madison Erdmann and Frank Ralph) had done even one-hundredth of their jobs. Half the sound, including key dialogue, seems to have been recorded on a pre-2005 mobile phone in a concrete conduit alley. The rest seems to have been recorded somewhere the scene was not set; but it doesn't seem to have been looped-in, just really BAD. By the last sequence the actors are just running around in an eastern-California field as though the plot expired 15 minutes ago (because it did; the denouement sequence is about 5-10 minutes too long). It's all a shame because the story itself had some merit.