Children of the Corn III: Urban Harvest

This movie is pretty much weird, but the performances were well. Daniel Cerny who plays Eli did a well job. The movie deals with pure evil it seems like. The gore parts are rather weird as well and have no purpose, to me killing people and worshiping a harvest or corn is rather spooky. But since I've seen scary movies this one came out to be rather weird and not so much disturbing just really. I know I say weird a lot in this review, but some of the graphics were weird too. I'm surprised they made a whole bunch of sequels to Children Of The Corn based upon the Stephen King novel "Children Of The Corn".

COTC3 is not that bad. Seriously. It is a gory, silly, watchable horror flick that, despite being a third in a series (that never should've started anyway), is a notch above your average B-horror film. I recommend it because it's got a lot of clever gore and some freaky scare scenes. Infinitely better than the last two, this one's a lowest common denominator entertainer. GRADE: B-

Children of the corn III: urban harvest is one of the best cotc movie if not the best. It is different from the other cotc movies because it is set in the city of Chicago instead of the country town of Gatlin which is different but being different is not bad but it might not please the fans of the series. The story is about two brothers who's father gets killed so they are taken in by a couple from Chicago, then the terror starts.I didn't mind the movie it but the last ten minutes were just horrible the creature was just disturbing and I didn't know that He Who Walks Behind The Rows liked to play with Barbie dolls. You don't have to watch the first two movies to understand this but you might not get who He Who Walks Behind The Rows is. Overall this movie is OK and if you want a few laughs at the mistakes in the movie then watch it you might end up liking it.

I have seen all of the "Corn" movies and I hated all of them, except this one was pretty damn good! I especially loved the good cast and action with the girl's hedge clippers and how she almost died and then she tripped backwards and died and the water/blood splurted out of her! Very enjoyable, if there is one "Corn" flick you want to see, see this awesome one!

It's "Children of the Corn III," the third part of the "Children of the Corn" movie series (a novel written by quite possibly one of the most twisted men in novel writing, Mr. Stephen King!). I have seen bits and pieces (yes, real bits and pieces, LOL) of the first movie on television and it sure looked scary! And with part three already made, then that means that the horror is three times more scary than in the first one! Ahhh! What I liked the best about "Children of the Corn III" is that, being the very last of these movies, everything all suspenseful and stuff winds on down to the end - and with a mighty big finish, might I add! If you need to sit on down to a really great and exciting horror movie, look no further to the genius of horror - Mr. Stephen King, whose works always get 10 stars.

Children of the Corn 3- Urban Harvest was the best sequel of the Children Of The Corn movies! Daniel Cerny is one of the best child actors I have ever seen. This movie had a great and interesting story,and as very entertaining. There were many clever deaths, including the stepmother's death. The special FX were great for 1994, except for the ending..... I wanna slap the FX editor across the face! Towards the ending when the monster grabs the girl, you can totally see that it was a minitaure version of her like a barbie doll, you could tell by the way she moved and just the look of her, she looked like plastic! But other than that, it was great! Just watch out when she stabs the monster, and then right when she drops the scythe, close your eyes for 5 seconds. Then you won't have to see that horrible FX job. All in all, it was really good other than that. I give it an 8 out of 10.

mostly everyone on here has been saying that this movie sucks and that the acting is bad, but the acting actually is very good. That was what made me sit through this movie, also I'm a fan of these movies anyway, I live for horror! the best performance in ths movie was given by Daniel Cerny, the worst performance was given by Ron Melendez. so, peace out.

This film has been unfairly slammed on here. It's no classic, but still it was an entertaining ride. First off the Eli kid was creepy, and not annoying, as many child stars tend to be nowadays. The kills were solid, malcolm's was nasty, and the mother's death was well done, with the water coming out of her mouth. The Corn series is not that good as a whole, but this one is very entertaining, and deliver's on the gore. The Corn monster at the end was a little cheesy, but the carnage, and kills it inflicts are off the hook. I rate all movies differently, but as horror sequels' go, I can't think of two many bad things to say about this one, the gore was here, the acting was solid, and I was never bored.

This third part of the franchise see's two children from the original town massacre adopted and moved to the big city. One takes to his new surroundings well and begins to make friends while his younger brother continues his loyalty to "He who behinds behind the rows" For a start I was glad of the new setting, however it quickly became apparent that they really weren't going to utilize it. Eli becomes yet another child preacher and alike those before him is obnoxious and plays his well really well. The film itself plays out basically exactly as you'd expect. Religion, a few deaths and an "Ultimate showdown" at the end. Not good, not bad, just more of the same when by all rights it should have been really quite different. The Good: Follows on quite well The Bad: Nothing exactly stands out Some ropey sfx at the end Things I Learnt From This Movie: Corn cross, corn bible, whole things getting a bit corny

I know that there not the best movies ever made, but I enjoyed the first two movies in this series. I was thinking the same about this one but the part with the living scarecrow and the horrible special effects from the monster changed how I thought about this movie. !SPOILER ALERT! It would have been better if Eli was killed more slowly and then end it with a few flashes and stuff, throw the ministers bible in the flashes. That way the horrible monster effect could have been avoided. I didn't think Eli's step-mother should have died (I forget her name, lets call her the girl from General Hospital) It was a very good death scene but it should have happened to someone else. This movie really wasn't totally necessary, but it can be entertaining you just sit back and go with the flow.