Attraction to Paris

Attraction to Paris

Moviecut—Attraction to Paris

Heather (Dina De Laurentiis ) is an American studying art in Paris. She meets some rich people and parties at their apartment located in the same building as wanted terrorist planning another attack. Plot spoiler: Odd man out dies while Heather manages to kill the massive terrorist. The three go on the run while Interpol agent Remington (Christopher Atkins) who has never seen a Liam Neeson film is after him. He is going to be canned by Tara Reid in a few days because he wants to hunt down the terrorist who killed his son in the 2005 London blast. The drama acting was bad. Tara Reid looked like she was auditioning for an elf part in "Bright 2." The plot line had all kind of holes. Does anyone pick Dina De Laurentiis over Olivia Jordan? I just didn't feel it. Guide; F-word. Brief sex. No nudity.

After watching this movie, I feel like my life is such a waste. How could I sit and watch this piece of junk !!!! Absolutely horrible production and post production work. Actors should reconsider career choice. My brain became numb after watching this movie. Please value your life and go do anything else but don't waste on this junk.

Okay, we have a young girl, traveling in Paris, and meets 3 other "kids" on the street and hooked into partying with them the same night she arrives. Meanwhile, there is a terrorist dude that is building a bomb in the next room. The kids come back and are drunk and start doing "lines'. So the next part is where everything goes a bit weird. Not going to say much about what comes next but...there is a lot of holes in the plot. The acting is so, so. Kind of canned dialog. The action parts are highly rehearsed and not quite believable. Maybe they should have gotten Bruce Willis to play Atkin's part. As for Atkin's he should maybe stick with his main job of Outdoor Sports gear. Acting has passed him by, and he looks very aged. Maybe should have stayed out of the sun. If you want to kill a couple of hours and have Netflix you could snooze through this one. The photography and the city were well done. Story has potential but has become somewhat cliche.

We watch a lot of movies and this rates in the worst 1%. All the negative commentary by others is spot on. We knew it was a dud the moment we saw the greenscreening of Paris and all the stock footage. If I was any of the actors I would be pi$$ed I didn't get a overseas covid risky holiday. The Una bomber was plausible excep that he was implausibly angry and clearly not very good at his job (as a bomber) We debated whether Spain was Mexico or somewhere else. Surprise Puerto Rico. I guess to they got their holiday after all except for Tara who got to stay on Hollywood. The makeup wasn't bad. The details like us wall sockets in Europe and gas guzzlers in Spain was the dead giveaway. Hopeless plot, bad acting. Watch the first ten minutes then move onto something else you will thank me. 1 star for the blood and makeup. -9 for a shockingly poor script and awful acting and cinematography. Next time they should get better "Spanish" snipers too they missed some beautiful clear shots.

First few opening scenes feature green screen shots of Paris in front of which amateurish at best actors try their best to convince the audience that this movie will go anywhere. It doesn't... Boring and cringeworthy on all levels. I have not seen a tragic movie like this ever.

Wasn't sure when to turn this off so just watched till the end.. Hmmm, some ok acting (and some terrible!) but just a bad story. Attraction to Paris? You could tell they were never in Paris - bad CGI! So many things wrong in this film, but hey, have seen worse. Gave it 3* for finishing the movie!

I tried to engage myself with this BS at several points of the 'movie' to not avail. To be honest, only the first 7.5 minutes was I able to watch continuously, after that I tried at many points to look at it, futilely. To give you a clue, the opening credits are already so amateurish, that it is an insult to even amateurs. Straight to video films are well above its design 'quality'. However, what follows acting wise is even worse. Painfully bad. And at any point I tried took at it, it was the same. Like uninterested people from the streets were handed random dialogs to make them work in a film. They couldn't. It is a shame to waste precious resources to this kind of nonsense. Nice pictures though. That's why it earned 2 stars from me. Otherwise, it would be -5.

Total waste of time. Please skip. Ignore all the high ratings as they're probably part of the movie or paid to rate it so high.