9 Songs

menarik banyak adegan dewasa yang membuat hasrat croot💦💦

hi

sex mov.17

9 songs. The story of this movie is quite boring but sexual artworks are fantastic.

u

9 songs

Have you ever been standing in line behind two people who are making out or being really intimate and it makes you want to say "get a room already!"? 9 songs was like watching what people do when they are alone together. I'm not talking about simply watching people have sex (although there is plenty of that in the film) but watching people move around their kitchen to make dinner or taking their vitamins... All the boring things they never show in movies because they are exactly that: BORING! Watching 9 songs is like watching a friends home movies of what they do all day. It's shaky, grainy, badly lit. The intimate scenes are not titillating but almost invasive, their moments of coupledom give you no insight into their back story. The concert footage is grainy and full of crowd shots...I'd rather live it than watch it. I felt nothing for these characters, I had no idea what brought them together or kept them together or why he was going to Antarctica. 24 Hour Party People rocked. This did not.

I guess it was nothing less than destiny that lead someone called "Winterbottom" to make a movie that is primarily about * and the icy Antarctica. What's the connection between * and white landscapes? Well, in-between all the pornographic activity that goes on, you've got to have some nice scenery to fool some critics into thinking that this actually might have a point, dare I say even a message. The movie is quite simple really: Song. Sex. Song. "Take me!". Song. More heavy breathing. Song. Oral sex. Song. "I want you now!". Song. Yet more pornographic sex. Song. Etc. On a couple of occasions we get a bit of the old Antarctic. "Did you know that no human had been on the South Pole until the 20th century?" Hmm. Deep stuff. More sex. Song. "Antarctica is white and cold". (Awesome!). Song. Sex. Song. This piece of celluloid silliness is very easy to make fun of, but that's Winterbottom's fault. And what is the point in all this? The point is that a borderline anorexic fashion model can be easily suckered into doing * when she is told that it is actually "a Euro-festival-type art film". As far as the choice of music, well, I guess it could have been worse: Winterbottom could have chosen techno or rap or even Madonna or Aerosmith! (God forbid!) What else?... The movie is terribly exciting. Talk about fitting 9 Brit-Pop songs into a mere 66 minutes! Wow. Anyone who fell in love with "Intimacy" – another recent European * drama posing as art – should definitely check this film out. Or maybe they should just go to their local * dealer and get a proper, regular, unpretentious * film. In "Intimacy" the main protagonists were clearly embarrassed about doing the pornographic sex-scenes, whereas here it's your standard *, professionally executed, except that it's art, of course – and not just *. I can't emphasize this point enough! Very artistic and such. Deep and stuff. Made me wonder a lot about the "huge white plains" of the Antarctic. Heavy, man. Real deep and stuff.

A sorry nonsensical excuse for a * flick. Why in the world director Michael Winterbottom has confused himself into believing that by putting footage of live gigs in between explicit sex scenes warrants the film (I say film in loose terms, more like 'footage') as 'mainstream' or 'art-house' and not '*' is beyond me. This truly was a waste of a cinema ticket. The films plot or lack of one, consists of footage of live rock concerts followed by sex scenes followed by more live concert footage and more sex scenes in a vicious circle of tedium. This tiresome, lazy drivel is obvious proof that Michael Winterbottom is incapable of producing a film which shows the relationship between rock n roll and sex without simply forcing poor live footage of some great bands and gratuitous sex scenes in front the viewer over and over again. Boring. On a plus note for Winterbottom, this film has has NO redeeming features: A dreadful script if there was one, terrible sound quality especially for a film called '9 Songs' and as for the acting; it cannot really be judged considering that the sex scenes were so explicit that there was 'no acting required'. The film looks as though it was shot using a web cam and then edited on a mobile phone, incoherent and flawed in every way imaginable. In short, if you want to make a honest * flick make one and I might even buy it, but don't dress up live footage of rock bands with explicit sex scenes and expect us to be blinded into believing it's not a * flick. This should have never made it to the cinema, it stinks and I'm bored of talking about it.

When I saw Scorsese's "Last Waltz," I thought that I would never again see a concert film as true. And I haven't, until now. The Band were the last popular musicians to tell stories, have nearly all those stories be in the third person and tell them without irony. To do this is impossible today, or at least non- commercial. Scorsese is a flawed filmmaker, his flaw being that he is overly invested in character-driven storytelling. The two: Band and Marty, were a perfect mix: cinematic rock. Pure, without that nightmare stew of MTV videos. Now along comes Winterbottom. Nearly all viewers will be unable to accept a movie with sex in it as anything but a movie about sex. Shame on them. Confront it folks. That's his point: why is it so difficult to accept the difference? But the hangups of the viewing public are less interesting to me than the way he constructed this experiment. It is a rock concert (with a Nyman interlude). Nine songs, with us participating in the songs themselves, participating in the going to the concerts to listen to the songs, and participating in the experience that the songs are about: namely obsessive sex. And also, remembering (or even inventing the memory of) the sex, drugs and rock and roll we've seen. This latter is done by our hero in Antarctica. He serves as narrator, by the way. Thankfully, this intense sex avoids the theatrics of "Damage," and works to be as genuine as possible emotionally. Is it a good movie? Could it change your life? Will it change cinema forever? Probably yes. Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.